Investigating mechanisms of the attentional repulsion effect: A diffusion model analysis
- PMID: 38169043
- DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02439-3
Investigating mechanisms of the attentional repulsion effect: A diffusion model analysis
Abstract
This article investigates the decisional and attentional drivers of the attentional repulsion effect (ARE) using the diffusion decision model (DDM). The ARE is a phenomenon in which a subjective expansion of space is experienced outside the focus of attention. It is thought to occur due to changes in the functioning of visual cell receptive fields. The DDM is a model of the decision-making process that assumes responses are selected by sequentially sampling an encoded representation of a stimulus until sufficient evidence has been accumulated favoring one response alternative over the other. The model decomposes observed choice and response times into different latent variables corresponding to the rate of evidence accumulation, response caution, response bias, and the time course of stimulus encoding and response execution. In this article, we interpret changes in the rate of evidence accumulation as primarily reflecting perceptual-driven changes in stimulus representation. We interpret changes in response bias as primarily reflecting decision-level changes. We utilize the DDM's ability to estimate these variables independently to explore how they are each affected by cueing manipulations to clarify whether the ARE emerges due to attentional or decisional drivers, or some combination of the two. The results of this study could shed light on the mechanisms underlying the ARE, and has implications in our understanding of spatial attention.
Keywords: Attentional repulsion effect (ARE); Decision-diffusion model (DDM); Decision-making; Perception; Spatial attention.
© 2023. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Can arrows change the subjective perception of space? Exploring symbolic attention repulsion.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Nov;75(11):1997-2011. doi: 10.1177/17470218221076135. Epub 2022 Feb 4. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022. PMID: 35016559
-
Perceptual discrimination in static and dynamic noise: the temporal relation between perceptual encoding and decision making.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Feb;139(1):70-94. doi: 10.1037/a0018128. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010. PMID: 20121313 Free PMC article.
-
An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection.Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):283-317. doi: 10.1037/a0015156. Psychol Rev. 2009. PMID: 19348543 Review.
-
Cortical Brain Activity Reflecting Attentional Biasing Toward Reward-Predicting Cues Covaries with Economic Decision-Making Performance.Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jan;26(1):1-11. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu160. Epub 2014 Aug 19. Cereb Cortex. 2016. PMID: 25139941 Free PMC article.
-
Speeded multielement decision-making as diffusion in a hypersphere: Theory and application to double-target detection.Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):127-162. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1491-0. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019. PMID: 29968205 Review.
References
-
- Alister, M., McKay, K. T., Sewell, D. K., & Evans, N. J. (2023). Uncovering the cognitive mechanisms underlying the gaze cueing effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231181238
-
- Carrasco, M., & McElree, B. (2001). Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(9), 5363–5367. - DOI
-
- Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in quantitative methods for. Psychology, 1(1), 42–45.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources