Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986;31(4):391-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF00613512.

Effect of two different doses of nitrendipine on steady-state plasma digoxin level and systolic time intervals

Effect of two different doses of nitrendipine on steady-state plasma digoxin level and systolic time intervals

W Kirch et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986.

Abstract

The effect of two different doses of nitrendipine on plasma digoxin levels, urinary recovery and systolic time intervals was investigated in 8 healthy volunteers. Following a loading dose, digoxin 0.25 mg b.d.p.o. was given alone for 2 weeks. Then 0.25 mg digoxin b.d. was administered for two 1-week periods combined with nitrendipine 10 mg or 20 mg once daily. The study was completed with another digoxin monotherapy phase lasting 7 days. Nitrendipine 20 mg daily led to a significant increase in plasma digoxin levels and in its area under the plasma concentration-time curve AUC (0-12) was 9.7 ng ml-1h when digoxin alone was given and 11.2 ng ml-1h on co-administration of the calcium antagonist. Urinary recovery and renal clearance of digoxin were slightly but not significantly increased by nitrendipine. Nitrendipine 10 mg once daily caused a small, insignificant tendency to elevate the plasma digoxin level. Nitrendipine co-administration (10 and 20 mg once daily) did not significantly alter systolic time intervals, as non-invasively measured haemodynamic parameters, compared to digoxin treatment alone. Thus, nitrendipine 20 mg daily caused a significant increase in plasma digoxin concentrations and in its AUC, which would rarely be of clinical relevance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am Heart J. 1981 Sep;102(3 Pt 1):341-50 - PubMed
    1. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986 Aug;22(2):155-9 - PubMed
    1. Am Heart J. 1986 Feb;111(2):325-9 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984 Jul;36(1):19-24 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985 Feb;37(2):150-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources