Navigating the Landscape of Hydrocortisone Administration in Septic Shock: Current Concepts and Future Directions
- PMID: 38169849
- PMCID: PMC10758589
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49870
Navigating the Landscape of Hydrocortisone Administration in Septic Shock: Current Concepts and Future Directions
Abstract
Sepsis remains a formidable challenge in critical care medicine, often culminating in a life-threatening condition known as septic shock. This review article navigates the intricate landscape of hydrocortisone administration in septic shock management, delving into historical perspectives, current evidence, controversies, mechanisms of action, practical considerations, and the importance of precision medicine. Hydrocortisone's role as an adjunctive therapy is explored, highlighting its potential to stabilize hemodynamics, mitigate the inflammatory response, and improve patient outcomes. However, debates persist regarding patient selection, dosing regimens, safety profiles, and long-term consequences. The future of septic shock management lies in emerging therapies, precision medicine approaches, biomarker discovery, and targeted interventions. Moving forward, exploring novel therapeutic avenues, understanding patient-specific responses, and uncovering potential biomarkers will be crucial in advancing septic shock treatment strategies. Clinical guidelines provide a foundation, but individualized patient care, interdisciplinary collaboration, and ongoing research are essential to optimize treatment strategies. This article underscores the call for continued research and evidence-based practice as we strive to enhance the care of septic shock patients and pursue improved outcomes in this critical condition. Embracing future developments in the field will enable us to adapt and refine our approach, ultimately contributing to the advancement of septic shock management.
Keywords: critical care; evidence-based practice; hydrocortisone; inflammatory response; precision medicine; septic shock.
Copyright © 2023, Kommareddy et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019. Qatar Med J. 2019. PMID: 31763206 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af. Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23353941
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30. Intensive Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23361625 Free PMC article.
-
Steroids in the Management of Ionotropic-Resistant Septic Shock: A Comprehensive Review of Efficacy and Outcomes.Cureus. 2024 Aug 26;16(8):e67795. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67795. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39323670 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Neurobiological Implications of Chronic Stress and Metabolic Dysregulation in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Diseases. 2024 Sep 18;12(9):220. doi: 10.3390/diseases12090220. Diseases. 2024. PMID: 39329889 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous