Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 19:14:1255608.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1255608. eCollection 2023.

Contingent negative variation as an evaluation indicator of neurocognitive disorder after traumatic brain injury

Affiliations

Contingent negative variation as an evaluation indicator of neurocognitive disorder after traumatic brain injury

Xindi Ling et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Introduction: Neurocognitive disorders are commonly observed in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods to assess neurocognitive disorders have thus drawn the general attention of the public, especially electrophysiology parameter such as contingent negative variation (CNV), which has been given more emphasis as a neurophysiological marker in event-related potentials (ERPs) for diagnosing a neurocognitive disorder and assessing its severity. The present study focused on the correlations between CNV parameters and levels of daily living activities and social function to explore the potential of CNV as an objective assessment tool.

Methods: Thirty-one patients with a diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder after a TBI according to ICD-10 were enrolled as the patient group, and 24 matched healthy volunteers were enrolled as the control group. The activity of daily living scale, functional activities questionnaire, social disability screening schedule, and scale of personality change following TBI were used to assess daily living activity and social function.

Results: The scale scores in patients were significantly higher than those in controls. Maximum amplitudes before S2 and during the post-imperative negative variation (PINV) period were also significantly higher in the patient group compared to the control group and were positively correlated with four scale scores. The duration of PINV at Fz and Cz was significantly shorter in the patient group than in the control group. The CNV return to baseline from a positive wave at electrode Fz and Cz occurred significantly earlier in the control group than in the patient group, while at Pz, the result showed the opposite.

Conclusion: Lower amplitudes of CNV were associated with more severe neurocognitive disorder and greater impairments in daily life abilities and social function. The duration of PINV and the latency of returning to baseline from a positive wave were correlated with the neurocognitive disorder to some extent. CNV could be used as an objective, electrophysiology-based parameter for evaluating the severity of the neurocognitive disorder and personality changes after TBI.

Keywords: contingent negative variation; evaluation indicator; event-related potential; neurocognitive disorder; traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The points A, B, C, D and the duration of PINV in the EEG topography maps.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Procedures of the CNV paradigm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The grand average ERPs response between patients and healthy controls.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The topographic distribution of the grand average CNV amplitudes between patients healthy controls.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The parameters of CNV between patients with neurocognitive disorders after TBI and controls.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bruns J, Jr, Hauser WA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review. Epilepsia. (2003) 44:2–10. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.44.s10.3.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, et al. . Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: report of the lancet commission. Lancet. (2020) 396:413–46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fann JR, Burington B, Leonetti A, Jaffe K, Katon WJ, Thompson RS. Psychiatric illness following traumatic brain injury in an adult Healthmaintenance organization population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2004) 61:53–61. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.1.53, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung Y-C, Punchak M, et al. . Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. (2018) 130:1080–97. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gudigar A, Raghavendra U, Hegde A, Menon GR, Molinari F, Ciaccio EJ, et al. . Automated detection and screening of traumatic brain injury (Tbi) using computed tomography images: a comprehensive review and future perspectives. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:6499. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126499, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources