Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 13:67:102374.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102374. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Short-term effectiveness of single-dose intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in healthcare workers: a prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Short-term effectiveness of single-dose intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in healthcare workers: a prospective cohort study

Hongfei Mi et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: The pivotal phase 3 efficacy clinical trial has demonstrated that a two-dose regimen of dNS1-RBD (Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise, Beijing, China) is well-tolerated and provides wide protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the effectiveness of a single-dose regimen is still unknown. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of one-dose of dNS1-RBD against symptomatic Omicron infections in real-world conditions.

Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted during an Omicron outbreak among healthcare workers in Xiamen, China, from December 22, 2022 to January 16, 2023. Participants chose to receive single-dose of dNS1-RBD or remain unvaccinated based on personal preference. Healthcare workers daily validated their SARS-CoV-2 infection status, using either RT-PCR or rapid antigen test. A survey questionnaire was conducted to gather information on acute symptoms from individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2. The primary outcome was the symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections after enrollment in the dNS1-RBD recipients or the control group among all participants and by prior COVID-19 vaccination status.

Findings: On December 22, 2022, a total of 1391 eligible participants without a history of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled. Among them, 550 received single-dose of dNS1-RBD, while 841 remained unvaccinated. In the total cohort, the range of follow-up time was 1∼26 days. During the study period, a total of 880 symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified in the total cohort. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and the infections requiring medical attention were 19.0% (95% CI: 6.7, 29.7, P = 0.004) and 59.4% (95% CI: 25.1, 78.0, P = 0.004) in the total cohort, 11.6% (95% CI: -2.4, 23.7, P = 0.100) and 55.3% (95% CI: 15.3, 76.4, P = 0.014) in the participants with inactivated COVID-19 vaccination history, as well as 87.0% (95% CI: 72.6, 93.9, P < 0.001) and 84.2% (95% CI: -41.8, 98.2, P = 0.099) in the naïve participants, respectively.

Interpretation: When administered as a booster to individuals with a history of inactivated COVID-19 vaccination, a single-dose of dNS1-RBD provides protection against infections requiring medical attention at least in the short-term after vaccination. The data also showed that a single-dose of dNS1-RBD is protective against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections as a primary immunization for individuals without prior exposure, but due to the limited sample size of naïve participants, further research with a larger sample size is needed to make a solid conclusion.

Funding: Xiamen Science and Technology Bureau 2022 General Science and Technology Plan Project and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Keywords: Effectiveness; Intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine; SARS-CoV-2; Single-dose regimen; dNS1-RBD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study profile. For the participants with inactivated COVID-19 vaccination history, there were 473 in the vaccine group and the follow-up time was 6418 person-days, as well as 746 in the control group and the follow-up time was 9207 person-days; For the Naïve participants, there were 63 in the vaccine group and the follow-up time was 1182 person-days, as well as 65 in the control group and the follow-up time was 623 person-days. During the study period, a total of 44 participants failed to undergo virus infection screening nor report their daily health status as requested, which we defined as lost to follow-up.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic infections and those with at least one symptom graded as 3 or higher. A: Total population; B: Participants with inactivated COVID-19 vaccination history; C: Naïve participants; (a) All the symptomatic infection events; (b) Infection events with at least one symptom ≥ grade 3 (requiring medical attention).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miyah Y., Benjelloun M., Lairini S., Lahrichi A. COVID-19 impact on public health, environment, human psychology, global socioeconomy, and education. ScientificWorldJournal. 2022;2022 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore K.A., Leighton T., Ostrowsky J.T., et al. A research and development (R&D) roadmap for broadly protective coronavirus vaccines: a pandemic preparedness strategy. Vaccine. 2023;41(13):2101–2112. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rahimi F., Talebi Bezmin Abadi A. Omicron: a highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variant. Gene Rep. 2022;27 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Higdon M.M., Baidya A., Walter K.K., et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccination against COVID-19 caused by the omicron variant. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(8):1114–1116. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowe B., Xie Y., Al-Aly Z. Acute and postacute sequelae associated with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Nat Med. 2022;28(11):2398–2405. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources