Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2350036.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50036.

Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis

Affiliations

Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis

Seokhun Yang et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Treatment strategies for intermediate coronary lesions guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes. Identifying low-risk deferred vessels to ensure the safe deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and high-risk revascularized vessels that necessitate thorough follow-up can help determine optimal treatment strategies.

Objectives: To investigate outcomes according to treatment types and FFR and IVUS parameters after FFR- or IVUS-guided treatment.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included patients with intermediate coronary stenosis from the Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial, an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial that assigned patients into an IVUS-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for minimum lumen area [MLA] ≤3 mm2 or 3 mm2 to 4 mm2 with plaque burden [PB] ≥70%) or an FFR-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for FFR ≤0.80). Data were analyzed from November to December 2022.

Exposures: FFR or IVUS parameters within the deferred and revascularized vessels.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and revascularization at 2 years.

Results: A total of 1619 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9.6] years; 1137 [70.2%] male) with 1753 vessels were included in analysis. In 950 vessels for which revascularization was deferred, incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.8% vs 4.1%; P = .72). Vessels with FFR greater than 0.92 in the FFR group and MLA greater than 4.5 mm2 or PB of 58% or less in the IVUS group were identified as low-risk deferred vessels, with a decreased risk of TVF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.09-0.71]; P = .009). In 803 revascularized vessels, the incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.6% vs 3.7%; P = .95), which was similar in the revascularized vessels undergoing PCI optimization (4.2% vs 2.5%; P = .31). Vessels with post-PCI FFR of 0.80 or less in the FFR group or minimum stent area of 6.0 mm2 or less or with PB at stent edge greater than 58% in the IVUS group had an increased risk for TVF (HR, 7.20 [95% CI, 3.20-16.21]; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis, FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies showed comparable outcomes in both deferred and revascularized vessels. Binary FFR and IVUS parameters could further define low-risk deferred vessels and high-risk revascularized vessels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Han reported receiving grants from Abbott Korea, Biosensors International Group, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr Koo reported receiving grants from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Philips. Dr J. M. Lee reported receiving grants from Abbott and Philips. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Study Recruitment Flowchart
DCB indicates drug-coated balloon; FFR, fractional flow reserve; IVUS, intravascular ultrasonography; and PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Risk of Target Vessel Failure (TVF) in Deferred Vessels by Binary Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Intravascular Ultrasonography (IVUS) Parameters
A, Two-year rate of TVF in low-risk and high-risk deferred vessels defined by optimal cutoff values for estimating risk of TVF. Low-risk deferred vessels were defined as those with FFR greater than 0.92 or minimum lumen area (MLA) greater than 4.5 mm2 or plaque burden (PB) of 58% or less. B, Two-year rate of TVF of low-risk deferred vessels, high-risk deferred vessels, FFR-guided revascularized vessels, and IVUS-guided revascularized vessels.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Risk of Target Vessel Failure (TVF) in Revascularized Vessels by Binary Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Intravascular Ultrasonography (IVUS) Parameters After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
A, Two-year rate of TVF in low-risk and high-risk revascularized vessels, defined by optimal cutoff values for estimating risk of TVF. High-risk revascularized vessels were defined as those with post-PCI FFR 0.80 or less or minimum stent area (MSA) 6.0 mm2 or less and plaque burden (PB) at stent edge greater than 58%. B, Two-year rate of TVF of low-risk revascularized vessels, high-risk revascularized vessels, FFR-guided deferred vessels, and IVUS-guided deferred vessels.

References

    1. Kogame N, Ono M, Kawashima H, et al. . The impact of coronary physiology on contemporary clinical decision making. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(14):1617-1638. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.040 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mintz GS, Guagliumi G. Intravascular imaging in coronary artery disease. Lancet. 2017;390(10096):793-809. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31957-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. ; Writing Committee Members . 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(2):e21-e129. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. ; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407-477. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iannaccone M, Abdirashid M, Annone U, et al. . Comparison between functional and intravascular imaging approaches guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized and propensity matching studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;95(7):1259-1266. doi:10.1002/ccd.28410 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types