Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 3;8(1):zrad107.
doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad107.

Abdominal drainage after elective colorectal surgery: propensity score-matched retrospective analysis of an Italian cohort

Collaborators, Affiliations

Abdominal drainage after elective colorectal surgery: propensity score-matched retrospective analysis of an Italian cohort

Stefano Guadagni et al. BJS Open. .

Abstract

Background: In Italy, surgeons continue to drain the abdominal cavity in more than 50 per cent of patients after colorectal resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of abdominal drain placement on early adverse events in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Methods: A database was retrospectively analysed through a 1:1 propensity score-matching model including 21 covariates. The primary endpoint was the postoperative duration of stay, and the secondary endpoints were surgical site infections, infectious morbidity rate defined as surgical site infections plus pulmonary infections plus urinary infections, anastomotic leakage, overall morbidity rate, major morbidity rate, reoperation and mortality rates. The results of multiple logistic regression analyses were presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95 per cent c.i.

Results: A total of 6157 patients were analysed to produce two well-balanced groups of 1802 patients: group (A), no abdominal drain(s) and group (B), abdominal drain(s). Group A versus group B showed a significantly lower risk of postoperative duration of stay >6 days (OR 0.60; 95 per cent c.i. 0.51-0.70; P < 0.001). A mean postoperative duration of stay difference of 0.86 days was detected between groups. No difference was recorded between the two groups for all the other endpoints.

Conclusion: This study confirms that placement of abdominal drain(s) after elective colorectal surgery is associated with a non-clinically significant longer (0.86 days) postoperative duration of stay but has no impact on any other secondary outcomes, confirming that abdominal drains should not be used routinely in colorectal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart according to the reporting and guidelines in propensity score analysis iCral, Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage study group; ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery; SMD, standardized mean difference.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Love plot of covariate standardized mean differences between treatment and control groups before and after matching; the vertical lines represent the interval of ± 0.1 within which balance is considered acceptable ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery.

References

    1. Smith SR, Gilmore OJ. Surgical drainage. Br J Hosp Med 1985;33:308–315 - PubMed
    1. Memon MA, Memon MI, Donohue JH. Abdominal drains: a brief historical review. Ir Med J 2001;94:164–166 - PubMed
    1. Puleo F, Mishra N, Hall J. Use of intra-abdominal drains. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2013;26:174–177 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mujagic E, Zeindler J, Coslovsky M, Hoffmann H, Soysal SD, Mechera R et al. The association of surgical drains with surgical site infections—a prospective observational study. Am J Surg 2019;217:17–23 - PubMed
    1. Tsujinaka S, Konishi F. Drain vs no drain after colorectal surgery. Indian J Surg Oncol 2011;2:3–8 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms