Efficacy and acceptability of cognitive-behavioral therapy and serotonin reuptake inhibitors for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: a network meta-analysis
- PMID: 38171647
- DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13934
Efficacy and acceptability of cognitive-behavioral therapy and serotonin reuptake inhibitors for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: a network meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) are recommended treatments for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but their relative efficacy and acceptability have not been comprehensively examined. Further, it remains unclear whether the efficacy of in-person CBT is conserved when delivered in other formats, such as over telephone/webcam or as Internet-delivered CBT (ICBT).
Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, trial registries, and previous systematic reviews were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CBT (in-person, webcam/telephone-delivered, or ICBT) or SRIs with control conditions or each other. Network meta-analyses were conducted to examine efficacy (post-treatment Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale) and acceptability (treatment discontinuation). Confidence in effect estimates was evaluated with CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis).
Results: Thirty eligible RCTs and 35 contrasts comprising 2,057 youth with OCD were identified. In-person CBT was significantly more efficacious than ICBT, waitlist, relaxation training, and pill placebo (MD range: 3.95-11.10; CINeMA estimate of confidence: moderate) but did not differ significantly from CBT delivered via webcam/telephone (MD: 0.85 [-2.51, 4.21]; moderate), SRIs (MD: 3.07 [-0.07, 6.20]; low), or the combination of in-person CBT and SRIs (MD: -1.20 [-5.29, 2.91]; low). SRIs were significantly more efficacious than pill placebo (MD: 4.59 [2.70, 6.48]; low) and waitlist (MD: 8.03 [4.24, 11.82]; moderate). No significant differences for acceptability emerged, but confidence in estimates was low.
Conclusions: In-person CBT and SRIs produce clear benefits compared to waitlist and pill placebo and should be integral parts of the clinical management of pediatric OCD, with in-person CBT overall having a stronger evidence base. The combination of in-person CBT and SRIs may be most efficacious, but few studies hinder firm conclusions. The efficacy of CBT appears conserved when delivered via webcam/telephone, while more trials evaluating ICBT are needed.
Keywords: CBT; OCD; adolescents; children; efficacy; medication; meta‐analysis; pharmacotherapy.
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.
References
-
- Andrade, C. (2017). Likelihood of being helped or harmed as a measure of clinical outcomes in psychopharmacology. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 78, 11381.
-
- Asbahr, F.R., Castillo, A.R., Ito, L.M., Latorre, M.D., Moreira, M.N., & Lotufo‐Neto, F. (2005). Group cognitive‐behavioral therapy versus sertraline for the treatment of children and adolescents with obsessive‐compulsive disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 1128–1136.
-
- Aspvall, K., Andersson, E., Melin, K., Norlin, L., Eriksson, V., Vigerland, S., … Serlachius, E. (2021). Effect of an internet‐delivered stepped‐care program vs in‐person cognitive behavioral therapy on obsessive‐compulsive disorder symptoms in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 325, 1863–1873.
-
- Balduzzi, S., Rücker, G., Nikolakopoulou, A., Papakonstantinou, T., Salanti, G., Efthimiou, O., & Schwarzer, G. (2023). Netmeta: An R package for network meta‐analysis using frequentist methods. Journal of Statistical Software, 106, 1–40.
-
- Balduzzi, S., Rücker, G., & Schwarzer, G. (2019). How to perform a meta‐analysis with R: A practical tutorial. BMJ Mental Health, 22, 153–160.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical