Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;63(1):7-16.
doi: 10.1007/s00411-023-01049-w. Epub 2024 Jan 3.

Lifetime excess absolute risk for lung cancer due to exposure to radon: results of the pooled uranium miners cohort study PUMA

Affiliations

Lifetime excess absolute risk for lung cancer due to exposure to radon: results of the pooled uranium miners cohort study PUMA

M Kreuzer et al. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

The Pooled Uranium Miners Analysis (PUMA) study is the largest uranium miners cohort with 119,709 miners, 4.3 million person-years at risk and 7754 lung cancer deaths. Excess relative rate (ERR) estimates for lung cancer mortality per unit of cumulative exposure to radon progeny in working level months (WLM) based on the PUMA study have been reported. The ERR/WLM was modified by attained age, time since exposure or age at exposure, and exposure rate. This pattern was found for the full PUMA cohort and the 1960 + sub-cohort, i.e., miners hired in 1960 or later with chronic low radon exposures and exposure rates. The aim of the present paper is to calculate the lifetime excess absolute risk (LEAR) of lung cancer mortality per WLM using the PUMA risk models, as well as risk models derived in previously published smaller uranium miner studies, some of which are included in PUMA. The same methods were applied for all risk models, i.e., relative risk projection up to <95 years of age, an exposure scenario of 2 WLM per year from age 18-64 years, and baseline mortality rates representing a mixed Euro-American-Asian population. Depending upon the choice of model, the estimated LEAR per WLM are 5.38 × 10-4 or 5.57 × 10-4 in the full PUMA cohort and 7.50 × 10-4 or 7.66 × 10-4 in the PUMA 1960 + sub-cohort, respectively. The LEAR per WLM estimates derived from risk models reported for previously published uranium miners studies range from 2.5 × 10-4 to 9.2 × 10-4. PUMA strengthens knowledge on the radon-related lung cancer LEAR, a useful way to translate models for policy purposes.

Keywords: Cohort study; Lifetime risk; Lung cancer; Mortality; Radon; Uranium miners.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
LEAR components by attained age (Upper part: ERR(a), Bottom part: age-specific contribution to LEAR, r0aERR(a)S~(a)) predicted in the full PUMA cohort (Kelly-Reif et al. , solid line) and the PUMA 1960 + sub-cohort (Richardson et al. , dashed line) for the exposure scenario of 2 working level months (WLM) per year from age 18 to 64 up to age < 95 years, assuming a 5-year lag for the BEIR VI exposure–age–concentration model, and using baseline mortality rates derived from the ICRP mixed Euro-American-Asian population (ICRP 2007)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chmelevsky D, Barclay D, Kellerer AM, Tomasek L, Kunz E, Placek V. Probability of causation for lung cancer after exposure to radon progeny: a comparison of models and data. Health Phys. 1994;67:15–23. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199407000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grosche B, Kreuzer M, Kreisheimer M, Schnelzer M, Tschense A. Lung cancer risk among German male uranium miners: a cohort study, 1946–1998. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1280–1287. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603403. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrison JD, Marsh JW. ICRP recommendations on radon. Ann ICRP. 2020;49(1_suppl):68–76. doi: 10.1177/0146645320931974. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harrison JD. Lung cancer risk and effective dose coefficients for radon: UNSCEAR review and ICRP conclusions. J Radiol Prot. 2021;41:433–441. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/abf547. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ICRP The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:2–4. - PubMed