Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2024 Mar;113(3):623-624.
doi: 10.1111/apa.17088. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

EBNEO Commentary: Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as postextubation support for preterm neonates in China: A randomized clinical trial

Faeq Almudares  1 , Bheru Gandhi  1
Affiliations
Comment

EBNEO Commentary: Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as postextubation support for preterm neonates in China: A randomized clinical trial

Faeq Almudares et al. Acta Paediatr. 2024 Mar.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

REFERENCES

    1. Miller JD, Carlo WA. Pulmonary complications of mechanical ventilation in neonates. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35(1):273-281, x-xi.
    1. De Luca D, Dell'Orto V. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates: review of physiology, biology and clinical data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(6):F565-F570.
    1. Zhu X, Qi H, Feng Z, Shi Y, De Luca D. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as Postextubation support for preterm neonates in China: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(6):551-559.
    1. Zhu X, Li F, Shi Y, Feng Z, De Luca D. Effectiveness of nasal continuous positive airway pressure vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation vs noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as support after Extubation of neonates born extremely preterm or with more severe respiratory failure: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(7):e2321644.
    1. Seth S, Saha B, Saha AK, Mukherjee S, Hazra A. Nasal HFOV versus nasal IPPV as a post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants-a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180(10):3151-3160.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources