Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 7;11(1):ofad621.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad621. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Higher Sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Over Tuberculosis Culture for the Diagnosis of Spinal Tuberculosis With Open or Computed Tomography-Guided Biopsies

Robyn Waters  1   2   3 , Maritz Laubscher  1   2 , Robert N Dunn  1   2 , Nawaal Adikary  4 , Anna K Coussens  3   5   6 , Michael Held  1   2
Affiliations

Higher Sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Over Tuberculosis Culture for the Diagnosis of Spinal Tuberculosis With Open or Computed Tomography-Guided Biopsies

Robyn Waters et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic specimens for spinal tuberculosis (STB) are mostly collected via open surgery. Percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies are used in times of limited surgical availability. However, poor diagnostic accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) culture has been reported with this method, due to limited sample volume and the paucibacillary nature of STB. We evaluated Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on open and CT-guided biopsies as compared with the gold standard Mtb culture and histopathology.

Methods: We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of Xpert Ultra, as compared with tuberculosis culture and histopathology, in adults with signs and symptoms of STB at a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa from November 2020 to December 2021. Diagnostic testing was performed on 31 patients with available samples.

Results: Xpert Ultra had a sensitivity of 94.7% (95% CI, 75.3%-99.7%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 75.7%-100.0%) against a reference standard of Mtb culture and histopathology. Xpert Ultra had high diagnostic accuracy in open and CT-guided biopsy samples with sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 100% (open) and 89% and 100% (CT), respectively. Mtb culture had limited specificity for CT-guided biopsies (43%; 95% CI, 15.8%-74.9%). HIV-1 coinfection did not affect Mtb abundance measures by Xpert Ultra or culture. Xpert Ultra was also superior to culture for STB diagnosis in patients concurrently treated for pulmonary tuberculosis.

Conclusions: Xpert Ultra detected more STB cases than culture for CT-guided biopsy samples. There was also no difference in sensitivity for open biopsies, irrespective of HIV-1 status, making it an important tool for rapid diagnosis, especially during times or in locations where open surgery is not possible or concurrent pulmonary tuberculosis treatment is initiated.

Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; diagnosis; spinal tuberculosis; tuberculosis; tuberculosis diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow diagram shows the number of individuals screened, consented, and excluded and the diagnostic definitions. STB, spinal tuberculosis; TB, tuberculosis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A, Difference in MTBC gene Ct values for rpoB or IS1081–IS6110 between definite and probable STB. Data are presented as median (IQR). B, Time to positive detection of Mtb in culture classified according to the semiquantitative value provided by Xpert Ultra. CT, computed tomography; Ct, cycle threshold; MTBC, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex; STB, spinal tuberculosis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Naim-Ur-Rahman, El-Bakry A, Jamjoom A, Jamjoom ZA, Kolawole TM. Atypical forms of spinal tuberculosis: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 1999; 51:602–7. - PubMed
    1. Dunn RN, Ben Husien M. Spinal tuberculosis: review of current management. Bone Joint J 2018; 100B:425–31. - PubMed
    1. Esteves S, Catarino I, Lopes D, Sousa C. Spinal tuberculosis: rethinking an old disease. J Spine 2017; 6:358.
    1. Gautam MP, Karki P, Rijal S, Singh R. Pott's spine and paraplegia. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2005; 44:106–15. - PubMed
    1. Held MFG, Hoppe S, Laubscher M, et al. . Epidemiology of musculoskeletal tuberculosis in an area with high disease prevalence. Asian Spine J 2017; 11:405–11. - PMC - PubMed