Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):264-285.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21825. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

Interpreting and integrating genomic tests results in clinical cancer care: Overview and practical guidance

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Interpreting and integrating genomic tests results in clinical cancer care: Overview and practical guidance

Raffaella Casolino et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun.
Free article

Abstract

The last decade has seen rapid progress in the use of genomic tests, including gene panels, whole-exome sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing, in research and clinical cancer care. These advances have created expansive opportunities to characterize the molecular attributes of cancer, revealing a subset of cancer-associated aberrations called driver mutations. The identification of these driver mutations can unearth vulnerabilities of cancer cells to targeted therapeutics, which has led to the development and approval of novel diagnostics and personalized interventions in various malignancies. The applications of this modern approach, often referred to as precision oncology or precision cancer medicine, are already becoming a staple in cancer care and will expand exponentially over the coming years. Although genomic tests can lead to better outcomes by informing cancer risk, prognosis, and therapeutic selection, they remain underutilized in routine cancer care. A contributing factor is a lack of understanding of their clinical utility and the difficulty of results interpretation by the broad oncology community. Practical guidelines on how to interpret and integrate genomic information in the clinical setting, addressed to clinicians without expertise in cancer genomics, are currently limited. Building upon the genomic foundations of cancer and the concept of precision oncology, the authors have developed practical guidance to aid the interpretation of genomic test results that help inform clinical decision making for patients with cancer. They also discuss the challenges that prevent the wider implementation of precision oncology.

Keywords: cancer genomics; education; germline; molecular profiling; precision oncology; somatic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Cole MP, Jones CT, Todd ID. A new anti‐oestrogenic agent in late breast cancer. An early clinical appraisal of ICI46474. Br J Cancer. 1971;25(2):270‐275. doi:10.1038/bjc.1971.33
    1. Schechter AL, Stern DF, Vaidyanathan L, et al. The neu oncogene: an erb‐B‐related gene encoding a 185,000‐Mr tumour antigen. Nature. 1984;312(5994):513‐516. doi:10.1038/312513a0
    1. Druker BJ, Sawyers CL, Kantarjian H, et al. Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR‐ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(14):1038‐1042. doi:10.1056/nejm200104053441402
    1. Druker BJ, Talpaz M, Resta DJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR‐ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(14):1031‐1037. doi:10.1056/nejm200104053441401
    1. Mateo J, Steuten L, Aftimos P, et al. Delivering precision oncology to patients with cancer. Nat Med. 2022;28(4):658‐665. doi:10.1038/s41591‐022‐01717‐2

Substances