Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 4:8:e39211.
doi: 10.2196/39211.

Comparing Self-Reported Running Distance and Pace With a Commercial Fitness Watch Data: Reliability Study

Affiliations

Comparing Self-Reported Running Distance and Pace With a Commercial Fitness Watch Data: Reliability Study

Garrett Bullock et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: There is substantial evidence exploring the reliability of running distance self-reporting and GPS wearable technology, but there are currently no studies investigating the reliability of participant self-reporting in comparison to GPS wearable technology. There is also a critical sports science and medical research gap due to a paucity of reliability studies assessing self-reported running pace.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of weekly self-reported running distance and pace compared to a commercial GPS fitness watch, stratified by sex and age. These data will give clinicians and sports researchers insights into the reliability of runners' self-reported pace, which may improve training designs and rehabilitation prescriptions.

Methods: A prospective study of recreational runners was performed. Weekly running distance and average running pace were captured through self-report and a fitness watch. Baseline characteristics collected included age and sex. Intraclass correlational coefficients were calculated for weekly running distance and running pace for self-report and watch data. Bland-Altman plots assessed any systemic measurement error. Analyses were then stratified by sex and age.

Results: Younger runners reported improved weekly distance reliability (median 0.93, IQR 0.92-0.94). All ages demonstrated similar running pace reliability. Results exhibited no discernable systematic bias.

Conclusions: Weekly self-report demonstrated good reliability for running distance and moderate reliability for running pace in comparison to the watch data. Similar reliability was observed for male and female participants. Younger runners demonstrated improved running distance reliability, but all age groups exhibited similar pace reliability. Running pace potentially should be monitored through technological means to increase precision.

Keywords: GPS; Garmin; exercise; fitness; pace; pace distance; running; running distance; training load; wearables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant Flow Diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation and Bland-Altman Plots of the Reliability of Self-Report and Garmin Connect Weekly Running Distance and Running Pace. A. Weekly Running Distance (km) B. Weekly Running Pace (min/km).

References

    1. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006 Mar 14;174(6):801–9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351. http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=16534088 174/6/801 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eime RM, Young JA, Harvey JT, Charity MJ, Payne WR. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Aug 15;10(1):98. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-98. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1479-5868-10-98 1479-5868-10-98 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marlier M, Van Dyck D, Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Babiak K, Willem A. Interrelation of sport participation, physical activity, social capital and mental health in disadvantaged communities: a SEM-analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 9;10(10):e0140196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140196. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140196 PONE-D-15-24004 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. The Lancet. 2012 Jul;380(9838):247–257. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60646-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Global action plan on physical activity 2018-2030: more active people for a healthier world: World Health Organization. Organization World Health. 2019. Jan 01, [2023-12-14]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241514187 .