Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 4;18(1):e0011772.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011772. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Identifying opportunities to optimize mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: A visualization and descriptive analysis using process mapping

Affiliations

Identifying opportunities to optimize mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: A visualization and descriptive analysis using process mapping

Eileen Kazura et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The control of soil-transmitted helminths (STH) is achieved through mass drug administration (MDA) with deworming medications targeting children and other high-risk groups. Recent evidence suggests that it may be possible to interrupt STH transmission by deworming individuals of all ages via community-wide MDA (cMDA). However, a change in delivery platforms will require altering implementation processes.

Methods: We used process mapping, an operational research methodology, to describe the activities required for effective implementation of school-based and cMDA in 18 heterogenous areas and over three years in Benin, India, and Malawi. Planned activities were identified during workshops prior to initiation of a large cMDA trial (the DeWorm3 trial). The process maps were updated annually post-implementation, including adding or removing activities (e.g., adaptations) and determining whether activities occurred according to plan. Descriptive analyses were performed to quantify differences and similarities at baseline and over three implementation years. Comparative analyses were also conducted between study sites and areas implementing school-based vs. cMDA. Digitized process maps were developed to provide a visualization of MDA processes and inspected to identify implementation bottlenecks and inefficient activity flows.

Results: Across three years and all clusters, implementation of cMDA required an average of 13 additional distinct activities and was adapted more often (5.2 adaptations per year) than school-based MDA. An average of 41% of activities across both MDA platforms did not occur according to planned timelines; however, deviations were often purposeful to improve implementation efficiency or effectiveness. Visualized process maps demonstrated that receipt of drugs at the local level may be an implementation bottleneck. Many activities rely on the effective setting of MDA dates and estimating quantity of drugs, suggesting that the timing of these activities is important to meet planned programmatic outcomes.

Conclusion: Implementation processes were heterogenous across settings, suggesting that MDA is highly context and resource dependent and that there are many viable ways to implement MDA. Process mapping could be deployed to support a transition from a school-based control program to community-wide STH transmission interruption program and potentially to enable integration with other community-based campaigns.

Trial registration: NCT03014167.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Deviations from planned activity goals and timelines.
Panel A: Percent of activities with goal (left) and time (right) deviations, by delivery platform and country. Panel B: Percent of activities with goal (left) and time (right) deviations, by activity timing category. Panel C: Percent of activities with goal (left) and time (right) deviations over three years attributable to different deviation categories.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Process map, Cluster L, Benin.

References

    1. Becker SL, Liwanag HJ, Snyder JS, Akogun O, Belizario V, Freeman MC, et al.. Toward the 2020 goal of soil-transmitted helminthiasis control and elimination. Bottazzi ME, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018. Aug 14;12(8):e0006606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006606 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soil-transmitted helminth infections [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 14]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/soil-transmitted-helmin...
    1. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, Abbasifard M, et al.. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020. Oct;396(10258):1204–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, Diemert D, et al.. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. The Lancet. 2006. May;367(9521):1521–32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68653-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jourdan PM, Lamberton PHL, Fenwick A, Addiss DG. Soil-transmitted helminth infections. The Lancet. 2018. Jan;391(10117):252–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31930-X - DOI - PubMed

Associated data