Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 1;143(5):645-659.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005498. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

Evaluation of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Affiliations

Evaluation of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Viviana de Assis et al. Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) affects approximately 5% of couples. Although RPL definitions vary across professional societies, an evaluation after a second clinically recognized first-trimester pregnancy loss is recommended. Good quality evidence links parental chromosomal rearrangements, uterine anomalies, and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) to RPL. In contrast, the relationship between RPL and other endocrine, hematologic, and immunologic disorders or environmental exposures is less clear. Anticoagulant therapy and low-dose aspirin are recommended for patients with RPL who have also been diagnosed with APS. Vaginal progesterone supplementation may be considered in patients experiencing vaginal bleeding during the first trimester. Surgical correction may be considered for patients with RPL in whom a uterine anomaly is identified. Evaluation and management of additional comorbidities should be guided by the patient's history rather than solely based on the diagnosis of RPL, with the goal of improving overall health to reduce complications in the event of pregnancy. Most people with RPL, including those without identifiable risk factors, are expected to achieve a live birth within 5 years from the initial evaluation. Nevertheless, clinicians should be sensitive to the psychological needs of individuals with this condition and provide compassionate and supportive care across all stages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure Stephanie T. Ros disclosed receiving payment from UpToDate for a chapter about Zika in pregnancy. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2020;113:533–5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025 - DOI
    1. ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL, Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, Elson J, Kolte AM, Lewis S, et al. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Open 2018;2018:hoy004. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoy004 - DOI
    1. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O'Connor JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP, Canfield RE, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1988;319:189–94. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807283190401 - DOI
    1. Rossen LM, Ahrens KA, Branum AM. Trends in risk of pregnancy loss among US women, 1990-2011. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2018;32:19–29. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12417 - DOI
    1. Stephenson MD. Recurrent pregnancy loss: clinical evidence for suboptimal implantation. Infertil Reprod Med Clin North Am 2001;12:447–61.

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources