Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;130(4):694-700.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02547-w. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by a rapid breath test

Affiliations

Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by a rapid breath test

Qi Huang et al. Br J Cancer. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy combination has shown remarkable advances in the management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the identification of a reliable biomarker for predicting the response to this chemo-immunotherapy regimen remains elusive. While computed tomography (CT) is widely utilized for response evaluation, its inherent limitations in terms of accuracy are well recognized. Therefore, in this study, we present a novel technique to predict the response of ESCC patients before receiving chemo-immunotherapy by testing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath.

Methods: This study employed a prospective-specimen-collection, retrospective-blinded-evaluation design. Patients' baseline breath samples were collected and analyzed using high-pressure photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPPI-TOFMS). Subsequently, patients were categorized as responders or non-responders based on the evaluation of therapeutic response using pathology (for patients who underwent surgery) or CT images (for patients who did not receive surgery).

Results: A total of 133 patients were included in this study, with 91 responders who achieved either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), and 42 non-responders who had stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD). Among 83 participants who underwent both evaluations with CT and pathology, the paired t-test revealed significant differences between the two methods (p < 0.05). For the breath test prediction model using breath test data from all participants, the validation set demonstrated mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 ± 0.06. For 83 patients with pathological reports, the breath test achieved mean AUC of 0.845 ± 0.123.

Conclusions: Since CT has inherent weakness in hollow organ assessment and no other ideal biomarker has been found, our study provided a noninvasive, feasible, and inexpensive tool that could precisely predict ESCC patients' response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy combination using breath test based on HPPI-TOFMS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. The flow chart shows recruitment and allocation process.
*iRECIST modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 for immune based therapeutics; TRG tumor regression grading.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Sample collection and VOCs detection.
We collected and detected baseline exhaled breath from patients by HPPI-TOFMS. We illustrate two representative spectrum from a responder and a non-responder. The upper panel is the spectrum of a patient achieved complete response. The lower panel is the spectrum of a patient achieved stable disease. VOCs, volatile organic compounds.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Prediction model construction based on breath test.
a The flow chart shows the data analysis process. All 133 patients’ data set recorded by HPPI-TOFMS were randomly allocated into training set and test set in a ratio of 7:3. b Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) curve (with 95%CI) for the selection of responders in the validation set of all patients, c patients with pathological reports. CI confidence interval.

References

    1. Abnet CC, Arnold M, Wei WQ. Epidemiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:360–73. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.08.023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun JM, Shen L, Shah MA, Enzinger P, Adenis A, Doi T, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2021;398:759–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Topalian SL, Taube JM, Pardoll DM. Science. 2020;367:eaax0182. doi: 10.1126/science.aax0182. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. He S, Xu J, Liu X, Zhen Y. Advances and challenges in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:763. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sundar R, Smyth EC, Peng S, Yeong JPS, Tan P. Predictive biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibition in gastroesophageal cancers. Front Oncol. 2020;10:763. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00763. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types