Mosquito control by abatement programmes in the United States: perspectives and lessons for countries in sub-Saharan Africa
- PMID: 38178145
- PMCID: PMC10768238
- DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04829-3
Mosquito control by abatement programmes in the United States: perspectives and lessons for countries in sub-Saharan Africa
Abstract
Africa and the United States are both large, heterogeneous geographies with a diverse range of ecologies, climates and mosquito species diversity which contribute to disease transmission and nuisance biting. In the United States, mosquito control is nationally, and regionally coordinated and in so much as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) provides guidance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides pesticide registration, and the states provide legal authority and oversight, the implementation is usually decentralized to the state, county, or city level. Mosquito control operations are organized, in most instances, into fully independent mosquito abatement districts, public works departments, local health departments. In some cases, municipalities engage independent private contractors to undertake mosquito control within their jurisdictions. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where most vector-borne disease endemic countries lie, mosquito control is organized centrally at the national level. In this model, the disease control programmes (national malaria control programmes or national malaria elimination programmes (NMCP/NMEP)) are embedded within the central governments' ministries of health (MoHs) and drive vector control policy development and implementation. Because of the high disease burden and limited resources, the primary endpoint of mosquito control in these settings is reduction of mosquito borne diseases, primarily, malaria. In the United States, however, the endpoint is mosquito control, therefore, significant (or even greater) emphasis is laid on nuisance mosquitoes as much as disease vectors. The authors detail experiences and learnings gathered by the delegation of African vector control professionals that participated in a formal exchange programme initiated by the Pan-African Mosquito Control Association (PAMCA), the University of Notre Dame, and members of the American Mosquito Control Association (AMCA), in the United States between the year 2021 and 2022. The authors highlight the key components of mosquito control operations in the United States and compare them to mosquito control programmes in SSA countries endemic for vector-borne diseases, deriving important lessons that could be useful for vector control in SSA.
Keywords: Integrated vector management; Larval source management; Mosquito abatement districts; Mosquito control; Surveillance.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
We declare Clarke Mosquito Control and Leading-Edge Aerial Technologies provided meals and refreshments during our tours when visiting with them. We declare no other potential competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Efficacy of the mermithid nematode, Romanomermis iyengari, for the biocontrol of Anopheles gambiae, the major malaria vector in sub-Saharan Africa.Parasit Vectors. 2019 May 22;12(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3508-6. Parasit Vectors. 2019. PMID: 31118105 Free PMC article.
-
Bacterial larvicides used for malaria vector control in sub-Saharan Africa: review of their effectiveness and operational feasibility.Parasit Vectors. 2019 Aug 30;12(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3683-5. Parasit Vectors. 2019. PMID: 31470885 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current procedures of the integrated urban vector-mosquito control as an example in Cotonou (Benin, West Africa) and Wrocław area (Poland).Wiad Parazytol. 2009;55(4):335-40. Wiad Parazytol. 2009. PMID: 20209805
-
[Current malaria situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan].Med Parazitol (Mosk). 2001 Jan-Mar;(1):24-33. Med Parazitol (Mosk). 2001. PMID: 11548308 Russian.
-
Current vector control challenges in the fight against malaria.Acta Trop. 2017 Oct;174:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Jul 3. Acta Trop. 2017. PMID: 28684267 Review.
Cited by
-
Ownership and usage of insecticide-treated nets in Ghana: a scoping review of facilitators and barriers.Malar J. 2024 Aug 10;23(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05072-0. Malar J. 2024. PMID: 39127692 Free PMC article.
-
Larviciding for malaria control and elimination in Africa.Malar J. 2025 Jan 15;24(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05236-y. Malar J. 2025. PMID: 39815293 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Implementation Interruptions of 1,7-Malaria Reactive Community-Based Testing and Response Approach on Malaria Control Efforts - Southern Tanzania.China CDC Wkly. 2025 May 2;7(18):628-634. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2025.104. China CDC Wkly. 2025. PMID: 40376505 Free PMC article.
-
Elevating larval source management as a key strategy for controlling malaria and other vector-borne diseases in Africa.Parasit Vectors. 2025 Feb 7;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06621-x. Parasit Vectors. 2025. PMID: 39915825 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Challenges in the surveillance and control of mosquito-borne diseases in Europe and United States. The perspective from public health experts.One Health. 2025 Jul 8;21:101133. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101133. eCollection 2025 Dec. One Health. 2025. PMID: 40687597 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Debboun M, Nava MR, Rueda L. Mosquitoes communities, and public health in. Texas: Academic Press; 2019.
-
- Roll Back Malaria . The global malaria action plan for a malaria-free world. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials