Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 21:14:1309073.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1309073. eCollection 2023.

Reimagining the joint task force core competency framework for rural and frontier clinical research professionals conducting hybrid and decentralized trials

Jamie M Besel  1   2 , Elizabeth A Johnson  2   3 , Jiahui Ma  3   4 , Becky Kiesow  5
Affiliations

Reimagining the joint task force core competency framework for rural and frontier clinical research professionals conducting hybrid and decentralized trials

Jamie M Besel et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical research professionals (i.e., clinical research assistants, clinical research nurses, clinical research coordinators, etc.), as outlined by the Joint Task Force (JTF) Core Competency Framework, are highly trained to support the breadth of clinical trial operations and manage participant care. Clinical research professionals are uniquely equipped with a scope of practice that permits product administration, participant assessments, and data management. As clinical trials grow in complexity and their management expands beyond traditional, site-based operations models to decentralized and/or hybrid models, the need becomes great to ensure adequate staffing. However, rural hospitals frequently lack the research staff or patient recruiters that would allow them to support decentralized clinical trials across a sizeable rural geographic demographic. Methods: This paper examines the contributory factors of the clinical research professional workforce contraction and response efforts at professional and organizational levels within a large, Magnet-designated healthcare system in the rural northwestern United States. Perspectives are shared on adapting the Core Competency Framework to reflect the unique strengths and opportunities towards decentralized trials in rural regions of the United States and areas of priority for workforce cultivation and retention. A descriptive survey was used to gather initial data identifying the current research perspectives of healthcare workers working across a rural community. Participants were asked to complete questions about the JTF Competency domains and behavior-based questions. Analysis: Both competency and behavior-based questions were asked and related to roles. These were then cross-referenced using a Rasmussen Ladder system. Descriptive statistics were conducted for sample characteristics, self-reported competency domain questions, and behavior questions. Results and discussion: Survey findings suggest that although healthcare workers and clinical research teams interact, they are unlikely to ask their patients to participate in research. Based on the limited response rate, results suggest that better education throughout the rural community could benefit from decentralized research efforts. Increased use of technology was also highlighted as an area of interest.

Keywords: clinical research professional; clinical research workforce; clinical trial enrollment; decentralized trials; frontier; joint task force competency framework; rural.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Rassmussen ladder of framework competencies and healthcare system clinical operations.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Categorized regional map of Montana for response selection.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Domain 7 (leadership and professionalism) response count by licensure.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baer A. R., Zon R., Devine S., Lyss A. P. (2011). The clinical research team. J. Oncol. Pract. 7 (3), 188–192. 10.1200/jop.2011.000276 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baquet C. R., Commiskey P., Daniel Mullins C., Mishra S. I. (2006). Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detect Prev. 30 (1), 24–33. 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.12.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bharucha A. E., Wi C. I., Srinivasan S. G., Choi H., Wheeler P. H., Stavlund J. R., et al. (2021). Participation of rural patients in clinical trials at a multisite academic medical center. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 5 (1), e190. 10.1017/cts.2021.813 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brady A., Naikar N. (2022). Development of Rasmussen's risk management framework for analysing multi-level sociotechnical influences in the design of envisioned work systems. Ergonomics 65 (3), 485–518. 10.1080/00140139.2021.2005823 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chacon J. A., Janssen H. (2021). Teaching critical thinking and problem-solving skills to healthcare professionals. Med. Sci. Educ. 31 (1), 235–239. 10.1007/s40670-020-01128-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed