Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 16;28(5):608-611.
doi: 10.5603/rpor.96869. eCollection 2023.

Esophageal cancer - the utility of PET/CT in staging prior to chemoradiation

Affiliations

Esophageal cancer - the utility of PET/CT in staging prior to chemoradiation

Adam Deja et al. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. .

Abstract

Background: Thorough staging plays a significant role in determining therapy modality in esophageal cancer patients. The aim of this study was to assess whether positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) may be safely omitted in selected groups of patients.

Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis included 37 esophageal cancer patients recruited to chemoradiation by the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) at the Greater Poland Cancer Center in 2021. Prior to radiotherapy planning every patient was referred to PET/CT to have the extent of their disease assessed.

Results: Among 37 patients PET/CT changed the staging status to metastatic (M1) in six cases (3 planoepithelial and 3 adenocarcinomas). In all those cases but one (1 patient with supraclavicular node metastasis finally received chemoradiation) confirmation of distant metastases excluded patients from radical treatment. Interestingly, in the PET/CT distant positive group 3 patients were initially staged as locally advanced (without nodal involvement). The other 3 were initially identified as at least N2 in tomography.

Conclusion: Results of this report allowed the conclusion that PET/CT plays a key role in esophageal cancer patients considered for radical chemoradiation; therefore, it remains a necessary tool to exclude metastatic disease in both main pathology types. Since the delayed time for PET/CT scan in esophageal cancer patients planned to chemoradiation may negatively influence treatment results, the data should be alarming for national health provider.

Keywords: PET/CT; chemoradiation; esophageal cancer; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tumor pathology proportion in the study. SCC — squamos cell carcinoma

References

    1. Noordman BoJ, Verdam MGE, Lagarde SM, et al. CROSS Study Group. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on health-related quality of life in long-term survivors of esophageal or junctional cancer: results from the randomized CROSS trial. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(2):445–451. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx726. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fiorica F, Di Bona D, Schepis F, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2004;53(7):925–930. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.025080. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Urschel JD, Vasan H. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer. Am J Surg. 2003;185(6):538–543. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00066-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Swisher SG, Hofstetter W, Komaki R, et al. Improved long-term outcome with chemoradiotherapy strategies in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(3):892–8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.061. discussion 898. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7):681–692. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources