Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;38(2):179-184.
doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03294-1. Epub 2024 Jan 5.

The median effective concentration of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal block in children: a dose-finding study

Yaqiong Tian  1 , Shangyingying Li  1 , Fei Yang  1 , Li Yang  1 , Ling Liu  1   2 , Wen Gao  1   2 , Shengfen Tu  3   4
Affiliations

The median effective concentration of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal block in children: a dose-finding study

Yaqiong Tian et al. J Anesth. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the 50% minimum effective concentration (MEC50) and the 95% effective concentration (MEC95) of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal block during hypospadias repair surgery of pediatric patients.

Methods: Children were enrolled with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II undergoing elective hypospadias repair surgery. Children were grouped into two age groups: toddlerhood (1-3 years old) and preschool (3-6 years old). We measured The MEC50 using Dixon's up-and-down method. The first children received the caudal block with 1.0 mL/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine. We determined each subsequent patient's concentration based on the previous patient's response and adjusted the concentration in intervals of 0.015%. Meanwhile, the probit regression analysis obtains 95% effective concentration (MEC95). In addition, we recorded the general condition, adverse events, and postoperative pain of each child.

Results: 46 children undergoing elective hypospadias repair surgery were included in this study, 22 in the toddlerhood group and 24 in the preschool group. Of the total number of patients, the caudal block was successful in 25 (54%) and failed in 21 (46%). The MEC50 of 1 ml/kg ropivacaine was 0.102% (95% CI 0.099%, 0.138%) in the toddlerhood group and 0.129% (95% CI 0.124%, 0.138%) in the preschool group. The MEC95 of 1 ml/kg ropivacaine was 0.148% (95% CI 0.131%, 0.149%) in the toddlerhood group and 0.162% (95% CI 0.134%, 0.164%) in the preschool group. Our results showed that ropivacaine concentration was statistically different between preschool children and toddlers (P < 0.001). None of the adverse events occurred.

Conclusions: This study showed that children in the preschool group required higher concentrations of ropivacaine than children in the toddler group during ultrasound-guided sacral block combined with non-intubated general anesthesia. At the same time, this method of anesthesia is safe and effective for children undergoing surgery for hypospadias.

Keywords: Caudal block; Child; Hypospadias; MEC50; Ropivacaine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hansen TG. Ropivacaine: a pharmacological review. Expert Rev Neurother. 2004;4(5):781–91. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dobereiner EF, Cox RG, Ewen A, Lardner DR. Evidence-based clinical update: which local anesthetic drug for pediatric caudal block provides optimal efficacy with the fewest side effects? Can J Anaesth. 2010;57(12):1102–10. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Sparks TN. Hypospadias. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(5):B18–20. - DOI
    1. Alizadeh F, Heydari SM, Nejadgashti R. Effectiveness of caudal epidural block on interaoperative blood loss during hypospadias repair: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(5):420.e1-420.e5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hong JY, Han SW, Kim WO, Cho JS, Kil HK. A comparison of high volume/low concentration and low volume/high concentration ropivacaine in caudal analgesia for pediatric orchiopexy. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(4):1073–8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources