Prevalence and predictors of stone passage after double J stenting for symptomatic ureteral stones: a cross-sectional, real-life study
- PMID: 38180579
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04717-0
Prevalence and predictors of stone passage after double J stenting for symptomatic ureteral stones: a cross-sectional, real-life study
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the rate of and predictors of stone passage (SP) after urgent retrograde stenting for symptomatic ureteral stones.
Methods: We retrospectively analysed data from 249 consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department for symptomatic ureteral stones and treated with retrograde stenting. Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics were collected. Stones parameters were collected before stenting and SP was evaluated at 1 month with computerized tomography. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between predictors and SP.
Results: Overall, median (IQR) age and stone diameter were 56 (45-68) years and 7.1 (4.4-9.8) mm, respectively. Stones were located in the proximal, mid and distal ureter in 102 (41.0%), 48 (19.3%) and 99 (39.8%) cases. SP was observed in 65 (26.2%) individuals. Stone diameter (3.2 vs. 7.7 mm, p < 0.001) and stone density (416 vs. 741, p < 0.001) were lower and a higher rate of distal stones (76.9% vs. 26.7%, p < 0.001) was found in the SP group compared to that with persistent stones. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that distal ureteral stone location (OR 7.9, p < 0.01) and lower HU (OR 0.9, p < 0.01) were associated with SP, after accounting for stone volume. Patients with a distal stone of 500 HU had a 75% probability of SP.
Conclusion: Stone passage occurred in 26% of patients with indwelling stent due to symptomatic ureteral stones. Lower stone density and distal stone location were independent predictors of stone passage. Patients with these criteria should be managed with follow-up imaging and stent removal instead of ureteroscopy.
Keywords: Emergency; Renal colic; Risk score; Stenting; Stone; Stone passage.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Prediction for spontaneous passage of ureteral stones with indwelling ureteral stent: PASS score.World J Urol. 2025 May 2;43(1):259. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05616-2. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40314850 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of spontaneous ureteral stone passage in the presence of an indwelling ureteral stent.Urolithiasis. 2019 Aug;47(4):395-400. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1080-8. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Urolithiasis. 2019. PMID: 30349974
-
A treatment strategy to help select patients who may not need secondary intervention to remove symptomatic ureteral stones after previous stenting.World J Urol. 2020 Nov;38(11):2955-2961. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03087-1. Epub 2020 Jan 20. World J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31960109
-
Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications.World J Urol. 2013 Aug;31(4):855-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0789-6. Epub 2011 Oct 29. World J Urol. 2013. PMID: 22037634 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ureteral stent versus no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 6;2(2):CD012703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012703.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30726554 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prediction for spontaneous passage of ureteral stones with indwelling ureteral stent: PASS score.World J Urol. 2025 May 2;43(1):259. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05616-2. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40314850 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bebi C, Fulgheri I, Spinelli MG, Turetti M, Lievore E, Ripa F, Rocchini L, De Lorenzis E, Albo G, D’Amico M, Salonia A, Carrafiello G, Montanari E, Boeri L (2022) Development of a novel clinical and radiologic risk score to predict septic complications after urinary decompression in patients with obstructive uropathy. J Endourol 36:360–368 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources