Short-term antiplatelet versus anticoagulant therapy after left atrial appendage closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 38180590
- DOI: 10.1007/s11239-023-02919-2
Short-term antiplatelet versus anticoagulant therapy after left atrial appendage closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic regimens after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from their inception to March 2023. Patients were divided into short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) group and antiplatelet therapy (APT) group. The incidence of events were performed using RevMan 5.4. The events including device-related thrombus (DRT), ischemic stroke/systemic embolization (SE), major bleeding, any bleeding, any major adverse event and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis were based on OAC alone or OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in OAC group. Oral anticoagulants include warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Fourteen studies with 35,166 patients were included. We found that the incidence of DRT (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66, P<0.0001) and all-cause mortality (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89, P = 0.002) were significantly lower in OAC group than APT group. However, there was no statistical differences in the incidence rates of ischemic stroke/SE (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.49-1.20, P = 0.25), major bleeding (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.55-1.27, P = 0.84), any bleeding (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.22, P = 0.34) and any major adverse event (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.30-1.03, P = 0.06) in the two groups. Subgroup analysis found that the incidence of DRT, all-cause mortality and any major adverse event in OAC monotherapy were lower than that in APT group (P<0.05), but not statistically different from other outcome. The incidence of DRT, all-cause mortality, any major adverse event and any bleeding in DOAC were significantly better than APT group (P<0.05). While warfarin only has better incidence of DRT than APT (P<0.05), there was no statistical difference between the two groups in other outcome (P>0.05). The incidence of DRT was significantly lower than APT group (P<0.05), major bleeding were higher, and the rest of the outcome did not show any statistically significant differences(P>0.05) when OAC plus SAPT. Based on the existing data, short-term OAC may be favored over APT for patients who undergo LAAC. DOAC monotherapy may be favored over warfarin monotherapy or OAC plus APT, when selecting anticoagulant therapies.
Keywords: Antiplatelet therapy; Device-related thrombus; Left atrial appendaged closure; Oral anticoagulation therapy.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness and safety of short-term anticoagulant regimens after left atrial appendage occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Thromb Res. 2024 Jan;233:88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.10.021. Epub 2023 Nov 25. Thromb Res. 2024. PMID: 38035647
-
Combined anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jul;17(30):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta17300. Health Technol Assess. 2013. PMID: 23880057 Free PMC article.
-
Reduced direct oral anticoagulant dose vs dual antiplatelet therapy after left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart Rhythm. 2025 Apr;22(4):979-986. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.035. Epub 2024 Nov 22. Heart Rhythm. 2025. PMID: 39581431
-
Antiplatelet versus anticoagulation treatment for people with heart failure in sinus rhythm.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 11;6(6):CD003333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003333.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40497467
-
Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure versus medical treatment in atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis from randomised trials.Heart. 2017 Jan 15;103(2):139-147. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309782. Epub 2016 Sep 1. Heart. 2017. PMID: 27587437
Cited by
-
Machine-learning model for predicting left atrial thrombus in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04847-w. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025. PMID: 40457228 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N et al (2021) 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 42(5):373–498 - PubMed
-
- Ogilvie IM, Newton N, Welner Sharon A et al (2010) Underuse of oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Am J Med 123(7):638–645 - PubMed
-
- January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H et al (2019) 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the management of patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society in collaboration with the Society of thoracic surgeons. Circulation 140(2):e125–151 - PubMed
-
- Osmancik P, Herman D, Neuzil P et al (2022) 4-Year outcomes after left atrial appendage Closure Versus nonwarfarin oral anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 79(1):1–14 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous