Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 15;32(6):279-285.
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00360. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

Optimizing the Entry Point for Medullary Hip Screws

Affiliations

Optimizing the Entry Point for Medullary Hip Screws

Kevin Huang et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Medullary hip screws (MHSs) are the most common treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures because they can be used for varied fracture patterns and resist shortening. Identifying the appropriate MHS entry point can be intellectually and technically challenging. We aimed to quantify the variability in the ideal entry point (IEP) for MHSs.

Methods: Standing alignment radiographs of 50 patients were evaluated using TraumaCad (Brainlab). The femoral neck shaft angle and the offset from the tip of the greater trochanter (GT) to the femur's longitudinal axis ('greater trochanter offset') were measured. Five MHS system templates were superimposed on the femur's longitudinal axis, and the distance from the GT tip to MHS's top center was measured. Five independent reviewers each templated 20 images such that all images were measured at least twice. A random sample of five images was selected for all five raters to measure and to calculate an intraclass coefficient Mean IEPs were compared with an independent sample Student t -test.

Results: The mean GT offset was 13.5 ± 5.6 mm (range 12.9 to 26.7 mm). The mean neck shaft angle was 129.5 ± 4.0 (range 120 to 139). The mean IEP for nail systems ranged from 5.7 to 7.1 mm medial to the GT tip; there was no notable difference in pairwise comparison of nail systems or in aggregate. Intraclass coefficient for all ratings, measurements, and nail types ranged from moderate to good. Both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were excellent.

Discussion and conclusion: In a sample with broad variation in femoral anatomy, there is a specific, roughly 1.5 mm wide interval that is 6.4 mm medial to the GT tip that serves as the IEP for the most common MHS systems. No notable difference seems to exist in the IEP among these MHS systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kane P, Vopat B, Paller D, Koruprolu S, Daniels AH, Born C: A biomechanical comparison of locked and unlocked long cephalomedullary nails in a stable intertrochanteric fracture model. J Orthop Trauma 2014;28:715-720.
    1. Ozkan K, Türkmen İ, Sahin A, Yildiz Y, Erturk S, Soylemez MS: A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones. Indian J Orthop 2015;49:347-351.
    1. Bretherton CP, Parker MJ: Femoral medialization, fixation failures, and functional outcome in trochanteric hip fractures treated with either a sliding hip screw or an intramedullary nail from within a randomized trial. J Orthop Trauma 2016;30:642-646.
    1. Gausepohl T, Pennig D, Koebke J, Harnoss S: Antegrade femoral nailing: An anatomical determination of the correct entry point. Injury 2002;33:701-705.
    1. Grechenig W, Pichler W, Clement H, Tesch NP, Grechenig S: Anatomy of the greater femoral trochanter: Clinical importance for intramedullary femoral nailing: Anatomic study of 100 cadaver specimens. Acta Orthop 2006;77:899-901.