Examining animal testing for risk assessment: A WC-12 workshop report
- PMID: 38182013
- DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105564
Examining animal testing for risk assessment: A WC-12 workshop report
Abstract
In toxicology and regulatory testing, the use of animal methods has been both a cornerstone and a subject of intense debate. To continue this discourse a panel and audience representing scientists from various sectors and countries convened at a workshop held during the 12th World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences (WC-12). The ensuing discussion focused on the scientific and ethical considerations surrounding the necessity and responsibility of defending the creation of new animal data in regulatory testing. The primary aim was to foster an open dialogue between the panel members and the audience while encouraging diverse perspectives on the responsibilities and obligations of various stakeholders (including industry, regulatory bodies, technology developers, research scientists, and animal welfare NGOs) in defending the development and subsequent utilization of new animal data. This workshop summary report captures the key elements from this critical dialogue and collective introspection. It describes the intersection of scientific progress and ethical responsibility as all sectors seek to accelerate the pace of 21st century predictive toxicology and new approach methodologies (NAMs) for the protection of human health and the environment.
Keywords: Animal welfare; Environment; Health; NAMs; Predictive toxicology; Regulatory testing.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The spectrum of views expressed in this article are those of the contributing authors and do not necessarily reflect those of their institution of employment or consensus. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
The validation of regulatory test methods - Conceptual, ethical, and philosophical foundations.ALTEX. 2024;41(4):525-544. doi: 10.14573/altex.2409271. ALTEX. 2024. PMID: 39440637
-
Use of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in regulatory decisions for chemical safety: Report from an EPAA Deep Dive Workshop.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;135:105261. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105261. Epub 2022 Sep 11. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36103951
-
Building knowledge of NAMs through risk science.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024 Nov;153:105702. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105702. Epub 2024 Sep 16. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39293706
-
New approach methodologies (NAMs) for human-relevant biokinetics predictions. Meeting the paradigm shift in toxicology towards an animal-free chemical risk assessment.ALTEX. 2020;37(4):607-622. doi: 10.14573/altex.2003242. Epub 2020 Jun 8. ALTEX. 2020. PMID: 32521035
-
Refinement, reduction, and replacement of animal use for regulatory testing: future improvements and implementation within the regulatory framework.ILAR J. 2002;43 Suppl:S63-8. doi: 10.1093/ilar.43.suppl_1.s63. ILAR J. 2002. PMID: 12388854 Review.
Cited by
-
Avoiding a reproducibility crisis in regulatory toxicology-on the fundamental role of ring trials.Arch Toxicol. 2024 Jul;98(7):2047-2063. doi: 10.1007/s00204-024-03736-z. Epub 2024 Apr 30. Arch Toxicol. 2024. PMID: 38689008 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources