Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):33.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05024-x.

Predatory publishing in medical education: a rapid scoping review

Owen W Tomlinson  1
Affiliations

Predatory publishing in medical education: a rapid scoping review

Owen W Tomlinson. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Academic publishing is a cornerstone of scholarly communications, yet is unfortunately open to abuse, having given rise to 'predatory publishers'- groups that employ aggressive marketing tactics, are deficient in methods and ethics, and bypass peer review. Preventing these predatory publishers from infiltrating scholarly activity is of high importance, and students must be trained in this area to increase awareness and reduce use. The scope of this issue in the context of medical students remains unknown, and therefore this sought to examine the breadth of the current literature base.

Methods: A rapid scoping review was undertaken, adhering to adapted PRISMA guidelines. Six databases (ASSIA, EBSCO, Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) were systematically searched for content related to predatory publishing and medical students. Results were single-screened, facilitated by online reviewing software. Resultant data were narratively described, with common themes identified.

Results: After searching and screening, five studies were included, representing a total of 1338 students. Two predominant themes- understanding, and utilisation- of predatory publishers was identified. These themes revealed that medical students were broadly unaware of the issue of predatory publishing, and that a small number have already, or would consider, using their services.

Conclusion: There remains a lack of understanding of the threat that predatory publishers pose amongst medical students. Future research and education in this domain will be required to focus on informing medical students on the issue, and the implication of engaging with predatory publishers.

Keywords: Information literacy; Publishing; Review; Students; Undergraduate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart detailing inclusion of studies for final scoping review. Reasons for exclusion are not mutually exclusive and therefore articles may be excluded for more than one reason. ASSIA: Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tennant JP. The state of the art in peer review. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018;365:fny204. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny204. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niles MT, Schimanski LA, McKiernan EC, Alperin JP. Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0228914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228914. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beall J. Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31:1511–3. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.10.1511. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grudniewicz A, Moher D, Cobey KD, Bryson GL, Cukier S, Allen K, et al. Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. Nature. 2019;576:210–2. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boukacem-Zeghmouri C, Pergola L, Castaneda H. Profiles, motives and experiences of authors publishing in predatory journals: OMICS as a case study. 2023.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources