Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):38.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10409-7.

Challenges of using evidence in managerial decision-making of the primary health care system

Marjan Hedayatipour  1 , Sina Etemadi  1 , Somayeh Noori Hekmat  2 , Alisadat Moosavi  3
Affiliations

Challenges of using evidence in managerial decision-making of the primary health care system

Marjan Hedayatipour et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Managerial Evidence-Based Decision-Making [EBDM] in the primary is a systematic approach that directs the decision-maker in a conscientious, explicit, and judicious utilization of reliable and best evidence based on the professional experiences and preferences of stakeholders and patients from various sources. This study aimed to investigate the challenges primary healthcare managers encounter while undertaking decision-making processes.

Method: A systematic review was conducted in 2022 with the aim of identifying and collecting all qualitative articles pertaining to evidence-based decision-making in the primary healthcare system. To achieve this, a meticulous search was conducted using the relevant keywords, including primary health care and evidence-based decision making, as well as their corresponding synonyms, across the databases Web of Science, Scopus, and Pubmed. Importantly, there were no limitations imposed on the timeframe for the search. To carefully analyze and consolidate the findings of this systematic review, the meta-synthesis approach was employed.

Results: A total of 22 articles were assessed in this systematic review study. The results revealed the main categories including evidence nature, EBDM barriers, utilizing evidence, decision-makers ability, organizational structure, evidence-based, EBDM support, communication for EBDM, evidence sides, EBDM skill development, public health promotion, and health system performance improvement.

Conclusion: The primary healthcare system is crucial in improving health outcomes and ensuring access to healthcare services for all individuals. This study explored the utilization of evidence-based EBDM within the primary healthcare system. We identified five key dimensions: causal, contextual, and intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences of EBDM as a core phenomenon. The findings will help policymakers and administrators comprehend the importance of evidence-based decision-making, ultimately leading to enhanced decision quality, community well-being, and efficiency within the healthcare system. EBDM entails considering the best reliable evidence, and incorporating community preferences while also exploiting the professional expertise and experiences of decision-makers. This systematic review has the potential to provide guidance for future reforms and enhance the quality of decision-making at the managerial level in primary healthcare.

Keywords: Decision-making; Evidence; Management; Primary healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
Prisma flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency distribution of studies in different countries
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
EBDM process Grounded Theory framework
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Persaud DD, Murphy M. The ELIAS framework: a prescription for innovation and change. Healthc Manage Forum. 2020;34(1):56–61. doi: 10.1177/0840470420950361. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Habib NMI. Leadership and organizational performance: Is it essential in healthcare systems improvement? A review of literature. Saudi J Anaesth. 2020;14(1):69. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_288_19. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bastani P, Alipoori S, Imani-Nasab M-H, Jamalabadi S, Kavosi Z. Evidence-based decision making among healthcare managers: evidence from a developing country. Int J Healthcare Manage. 2021;14(1):197–202. doi: 10.1080/20479700.2019.1632002. - DOI
    1. Guo R. Prediction of intention to use evidence-based management among healthcare administrators in the United States. School of Health Sciences, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan; 2015.
    1. Kurien VTV, Shamsuddeen S, Mahitha M, Rasheed DS. Evidence-based decision-making. J Head Neck Physicians Surg. 2022;10(1):48–52.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources