Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb:48:100959.
doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2023.100959. Epub 2024 Jan 5.

Genomic profiling in GIST: Implications in clinical outcome and future challenges

Affiliations
Review

Genomic profiling in GIST: Implications in clinical outcome and future challenges

German Calderillo-Ruíz et al. Neoplasia. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) are the most frequent mesenchymal neoplasia of the digestive tract. Genomic alterations in KIT, PDFGRA, SDH, and BRAF genes are essential in GIST oncogenesis. Therefore, the mutations in these genes have demonstrated clinical implications. Tumors with deletions in KIT-exon 11 or duplications in exon 9 are associated with a worse prognosis. In contrast, KIT-exon 11 substitutions and duplications are associated with a better clinical outcome. Moreover, mutations in Kit exon 9 and 11 are actionable, due to their response to imatinib, while mutations in PDGFRA respond to sunitinib and/or avapritinib. Although, molecular testing on tissue samples is effective; it is invasive, requires adequate amounts of tissue, and a long experimental process is needed for results. In contrast, liquid biopsy has been proposed as a simple and non-invasive method to test biomarkers in cancer. The most common molecule analyzed by liquid biopsy is circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). GISTs ctDNA testing has been demonstrated to be effective in identifying known and novel KIT mutations that were not detected using traditional tissue DNA testing and have been useful in determining progression risk and response to TKI therapy. This allows the clinician to have an accurate picture of the genetic changes of the tumor over time. In this work, we aimed to discuss the implications of mutational testing in clinical outcomes, the methods to test ctDNA and the future challenges in the establishment of alternatives of personalized medicine.

Keywords: GIST; Genomic profiling; KIT; Mutations; PDGFRA; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. This manuscript has not been submitted in other journal.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
Molecular landscape in GIST is related to treatment response. (A) principal signaling pathways involved in GIST development and progression. The hyperactivity of tyrosine kinase receptors triggers Jack/Stat, K-ras/MAPK and NF-1 signaling pathways to induce cell proliferation. (B) Drug response of GIST tumors is related to KIT or PDGFRA gene mutations. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are directed to alterations in cytoplasmic domain of the codified-receptors. Color circles represent sensitivity (green) or resistance (red) to the respective pharmacologic agent.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
Liquid biopsy implications in genomic profiling of GIST. The utility of liquid biopsy in diagnosis and monitoring of GIST is schematized. Liquid biopsy is one of the most useful techniques to determine molecular profiling, define the optimal choice of therapy, and predict response to treatment based on resistance mutations, representing a master key in the era of personalized medicine.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mandahl, N.; Mertens, F. Soft tissue tumors; 2010; ISBN 9780470181799.
    1. Parab T.M., DeRogatis M.J., Boaz A.M., Grasso S.A., Issack P.S., Duarte D.A., Urayeneza O., Vahdat S., Qiao J.H., Hinika G.S. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive review. J. gastrointest. Oncol. 2019;10:144–154. doi: 10.21037/JGO.2018.08.20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Share B., Alloghbi A., Al Hallak M.N., Uddin H., Azmi A., Mohammad R.M., Kim S.H., Shields A.F., Philip P.A. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a review of current and emerging therapies. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2021;40:625–641. doi: 10.1007/S10555-021-09961-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peng F., Liu Y. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the small intestine: progress in diagnosis and treatment research. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020;12:3877–3889. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S238227. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y., Renberg S., Papakonstantinou A., Haglund de Flon F. Diagnosing gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the utility of fine-needle aspiration cytology versus biopsy. Cancer Med. 2022;11:2729–2734. doi: 10.1002/CAM4.4630. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances