Retention of Virus Versus Surrogate, by Ultrafiltration in Seawater: Case Study of Norovirus Versus Tulane
- PMID: 38184502
- DOI: 10.1007/s12560-023-09574-z
Retention of Virus Versus Surrogate, by Ultrafiltration in Seawater: Case Study of Norovirus Versus Tulane
Abstract
In the field of chemical engineering and water treatment, the study of viruses, included surrogates, is well documented. Often, surrogates are used to study viruses and their behavior because they can be produced in larger quantities in safer conditions and are easier to handle. In fact, surrogates allow studying microorganisms which are non-infectious to humans but share some properties similar to pathogenic viruses: structure, composition, morphology, and size. Human noroviruses, recognized as the leading cause of epidemics and sporadic cases of gastroenteritis across all age groups, may be mimicked by the Tulane virus. The objectives of this work were to study (i) the ultrafiltration of Tulane virus and norovirus to validate that Tulane virus can be used as a surrogate for norovirus in water treatment process and (ii) the retention of norovirus and the surrogate as a function of water quality to better understand the use of the latter pathogenic viruses. Ultrafiltration tests showed significant logarithmic reduction values (LRV) in viral RNA: around 2.5 for global LRV (i.e., based on the initial and permeate average concentrations) and between 2 and 6 for average LRV (i.e., retention rate considering the increase of viral concentration in the retentate), both for norovirus and the surrogate Tulane virus. Higher reduction rates (from 2 to 6 log genome copies) are obtained for higher initial concentrations (from 101 to 107 genome copies per mL) due to virus aggregation in membrane lumen. Tulane virus appears to be a good surrogate for norovirus retention by membrane processes.
Keywords: Norovirus; Retention rate; Seawater quality; Tulane virus; Ultrafiltration; Virus surrogate.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Inactivation Mechanism and Efficacy of Grape Seed Extract for Human Norovirus Surrogate.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022 May 10;88(9):e0224721. doi: 10.1128/aem.02247-21. Epub 2022 Apr 25. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35465682 Free PMC article.
-
The Efficacy of Commercial Surface Sanitizers against Norovirus on Formica Surfaces with and without Inclusion of a Wiping Step.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022 Sep 13;88(17):e0080722. doi: 10.1128/aem.00807-22. Epub 2022 Aug 25. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 36005755 Free PMC article.
-
Environmental persistence of Tulane virus - a surrogate for human norovirus.Can J Microbiol. 2016 May;62(5):449-54. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2015-0756. Epub 2015 Dec 15. Can J Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 26825139
-
Rhesus enteric calicivirus surrogate model for human norovirus gastroenteritis.J Gen Virol. 2015 Jul;96(Pt 7):1504-14. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000020. Epub 2014 Dec 12. J Gen Virol. 2015. PMID: 25502652 Review.
-
The makings of a good human norovirus surrogate.Curr Opin Virol. 2014 Feb;4:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Feb 1. Curr Opin Virol. 2014. PMID: 24492067 Review.
References
-
- Antony, A., Blackbeard, J., & Leslie, G. (2012). Removal efficiency and integrity monitoring techniques for virus removal by membrane processes. Critical Reviews in Environment Science and Technology, 42, 891–933. - DOI
-
- Arenillas, S., Drouin, M., Monnin, E., & Moulin, P. (2017). Glycerin removal from ultrafiltration flat sheet membranes by filtration and soaking. Journal of Membrane Science and Research, 3, 102–108. https://doi.org/10.22079/jmsr.2016.23080 - DOI
-
- Barnes, C., Barber, R., Schneider, K. R., Danyluk, M. D., Wright, A. C., Jones, M. K., & Montazeri, N. (2021). Application of chitosan microparticles against human norovirus. Journal of Food Protection, 84, 2092–2098. https://doi.org/10.4315/JFP-21-220 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical