Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 6;24(1):23.
doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-04327-8.

Trends in the use of complementary and alternative medicine between 1987 and 2021 in Denmark

Sofie Rossen Møller  1 , Ola Ekholm  2 , Anne Illemann Christensen  2
Affiliations

Trends in the use of complementary and alternative medicine between 1987 and 2021 in Denmark

Sofie Rossen Møller et al. BMC Complement Med Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has been widely and increasingly used worldwide during the past decades. Nevertheless, studies in long-term trends of CAM use are limited. The aim of this study was to assess long-term trends in the prevalence of CAM use (both overall and for specific CAMs) between 1987 and 2021 in the adult Danish population and to examine certain sociodemographic characteristics of CAM users.

Methods: Data derived from nationally representative health surveys in the general adult population (≥ 16 years) in Denmark (the Danish Health and Morbidity Surveys) conducted in 1987, 1994, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2013, 2017, and 2021. The response proportion declined from 79.9% in 1987 to 45.4% in 2021. CAM use was assessed by questions on ever use of specific types of CAMs and overall use within the past 12 months. Differences in use of CAMs across educational levels were assessed using the Slope Index of Inequality (SII).

Results: An overall increase in the prevalence of CAM use within the past 12 months was found between 1987 (10.0%) and 2021 (24.0%). However, a stagnation was observed between 2010 and 2017, after which the prevalence decreased in 2021. In all survey waves, the prevalence was higher among women than men. For both sexes, the prevalence tended to be highest among respondents aged 25-44 years and 45-64 years. The group with 13-14 years of education had the highest prevalence of CAM use compared to the other educational groups (< 10 years, 10-12 years, and ≥ 15 years). SII values for both men and women increased between 1987 and 2021, which indicates an increase in differences of CAM use across educational groups. In all survey waves the most frequently used CAMs included massage and other manipulative therapies, acupuncture, and reflexology.

Conclusions: The use of CAM has increased markedly within the last decades and recently stagnated at high levels, which underlines the importance of securing high quality information and education for the public, health professionals, and legislators to ensure and promote safe use of CAMs.

Keywords: Complementary and alternative medicine; Questionnaire survey; Sociodemographic characterisation; Trends.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prevalence of CAM use within the past 12 months in total and by sex. Percentages
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CAM use within the past 12 months by sex and age groups. Percentages
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CAM use within the past 12 months by sex and level of education. Age-adjusted percentages
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Educational differences in CAM use within the past 12 months using SII values. Percentage points
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. World Health Organization. WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. Geneva; 2019.
    1. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998;280(18):1569–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.18.1569. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ernst E, White A. The BBC survey of complementary medicine use in the UK. Complement Ther Med. 2000;8(1):32–6. doi: 10.1016/S0965-2299(00)90833-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fischer FH, Lewith G, Witt CM, Linde K, von Ammon K, Cardini F, et al. High prevalence but limited evidence in complementary and alternative medicine: guidelines for future research. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-46. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canizares M, Hogg-Johnson S, Gignac MAM, Glazier RH, Badley EM. Changes in the use practitioner-based complementary and alternative medicine over time in Canada: Cohort and period effects. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0177307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177307. - DOI - PMC - PubMed