Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 7;24(1):37.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03814-1.

In vitro remineralization of adjacent interproximal enamel carious lesions in primary molars using a bioactive bulk-fill composite

Affiliations

In vitro remineralization of adjacent interproximal enamel carious lesions in primary molars using a bioactive bulk-fill composite

Win Myat Phyo et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Surface remineralization is recommended for the management of active non-cavitated interproximal carious lesions in primary teeth. According to the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, a recently recognized category of materials called bioactive restorative materials can be used for remineralization. This study aimed to evaluate the release of fluoride (F), calcium (Ca) and phosphate (P) ions from Predicta® Bioactive Bulk-fill composite compared with EQUIA Forte® and Filtek™ Z350 and to determine the remineralization effect of these 3 restorative materials on adjacent initial interproximal enamel carious lesions.

Methods: The release of F, Ca and P ions from 3 groups ((n = 10/group) (Group 1- Predicta®, Group 2- EQUIA Forte® and Group 3- Filtek™ Z350)) was determined at 1st, 4th, 7th and 14th days. After creating artificial carious lesions, human enamel samples were randomly assigned into 3 groups (n = 13/group) which were placed in contact with occluso-proximal restorative materials and exposed to a 14-day pH cycling period. Surface microhardness was determined using a Knoop microhardness assay at baseline, after artificial carious lesions formation and after pH cycling. The difference in the percentage of surface microhardness recovery (%SMHR) among groups was compared. Mineral deposition was analyzed with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and the enamel surface morphology was evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Kruskal-Wallis's test with Dunn's post hoc test and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test were used for data analysis.

Results: EQUIA Forte® released the highest cumulative amount of F and P ions, followed by Predicta® and Filtek™ Z350. Predicta® released higher amount of Ca ions than EQUIA Forte® and Filtek™ Z350. Predicta® demonstrated the highest %SMHR, followed by EQUIA Forte® and Filtek™ Z350. There was a significant difference in the %SMHR between Predicta® and Filtek™ Z350 (p < 0.05). However, EQUIA Forte® demonstrated the highest fluoride content, followed by Predicta® and Filtek™ Z350. The SEM images of EQUIA Forte® and Predicta® revealed the greater mineral deposition.

Conclusion: Predicta® demonstrated a marked increase in surface microhardness and fluoride content of adjacent initial interproximal enamel carious lesions in primary molars compared with Filtek™ Z350. Predicta® is an alternative restorative material to remineralize adjacent initial interproximal enamel carious lesions in primary molars, especially in high-risk caries patients.

Keywords: EDS-SEM; Initial interproximal carious lesions; Predicta® bioactive bulk-fill composite; Remineralization; Surface microhardness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic presentation of evaluation of ions release
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagrammatic presentation to simulate natural contact point
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schematic presentation of SMH measurement and EDS-SEM analysis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of the mean surface microhardness at baseline, after artificial carious lesions formation and after pH cycling among the 3 groups. * Comparison of the mean surface microhardness between Predicta® and Filtek™ Z350 after pH cycling (p = 0.002). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Mean of the percentage of surface microhardness recovery among 3 groups. * Significant difference between groups is indicated by an asterisk (*) using Dunn’s test of multiple comparison (p < 0.05)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
SEM images of the initial enamel caries after in contact with the restorative materials (Group 1- Predicta®, Group 2- EQUIA Forte®, and Group 3- Filtek™ Z350 at × 5000 and × 10,000 magnifications)

References

    1. Machiulskiene V, Campus G, Carvalho JC, Dige I, Ekstrand KR, Jablonski-Momeni A, et al. Terminology of dental caries and dental caries management: consensus report of a workshop organized by ORCA and Cariology research group of IADR. Caries Res. 2020;54(1):7–14. doi: 10.1159/000503309. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Sugars and dental caries (No. WHO/NMH/NHD/17.12). 2017. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sugars-and-dental-caries. Accessed 01 Feb 2022.
    1. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zewdu T, Abu D, Agajie M, Sahilu T. Dental caries and associated factors in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Prev Med. 2021;26(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-00943-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kassebaum N, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray C, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650–658. doi: 10.1177/0022034515573272. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types