Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 15;13(12):6090-6098.
eCollection 2023.

Risk prediction of poor wound healing in patients with thoracoscopic lung cancer resection with drainage tube

Affiliations

Risk prediction of poor wound healing in patients with thoracoscopic lung cancer resection with drainage tube

Yuguo Chen et al. Am J Cancer Res. .

Abstract

This work established a risk prediction (RP) model for poor wound healing (PWH) in patients with thoracoscopic lung cancer (LC) resection (TLCR) after drainage tube placement to explore its application effect. 359 patients with TLCR were categorized into a good wound healing group (GWH group, 275 cases) and a poor wound healing group (PWH group, 84 cases) based on incision healing condition. The independent prediction risk factors (IPRFs) of PWH were analyzed and a RP model was constructed. 70% of the patients were classified as the model group (Mod group) and 30% were in the validation group (Val group). Resolution of the RP model was evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit (HLGF) test was employed to evaluate the calibration of RP model. Results from the multivariate logistic regression analysis (MLRA) showed that age, preoperative albumin levels, diabetes history, dressing change frequency, and type of wound cleaning fluid were independent risk factors (IRFs) for postoperative PWH (P<0.05). In the Mod group, AUC=0.758 (P<0.05, 95% CI=0.712-0.806), and HLGF test showed P=0.493. In the Val group, AUC=0.783 (P<0.05, 95% CI=0.675-0.834), and HLGF test showed P=0.189. In conclusion, the constructed model was convenient, feasible, and demonstrates good predictive performance for postoperative incision healing issue, holding practical value and applicability.

Keywords: Lung cancer; poor wound healing; risk factors; risk prediction model; thoracoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curve in the Mod group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curve in the Val group.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lv D, He L, Guo L, Zhang X, He X. Acute kidney injury induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer patients. Discov Med. 2022;33:137–141. - PubMed
    1. Wang B, Zhang Z, Tang J, Tao H, Zhang Z. Correlation between SPARC, TGFβ1, endoglin and angiogenesis mechanism in lung cancer. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018;32:1525–1531. - PubMed
    1. Tong C, Miao Q, Zheng J, Wu J. A novel nomogram for predicting the decision to delayed extubation after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery. Ann Med. 2023;55:800–807. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reck M, Remon J, Hellmann MD. First-line immunotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022;40:586–597. - PubMed
    1. Wang SF, Mao NQ, Zhao WH, Pan XB. Postoperative radiotherapy in pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022;101:e29550. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources