Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 22:14:1273186.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1273186. eCollection 2023.

A new EEG neurofeedback training approach in sports: the effects function-specific instruction of Mu rhythm and visuomotor skill performance

Affiliations

A new EEG neurofeedback training approach in sports: the effects function-specific instruction of Mu rhythm and visuomotor skill performance

Kuo-Pin Wang et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Achieving optimal visuomotor performance in precision sports relies on maintaining an optimal psychological state during motor preparation. To uncover the optimal psychological state, extensive EEG studies have established a link between the Mu rhythm (8-13 Hz at Cz) and cognitive resource allocation during visuomotor tasks (i.e., golf or shooting). In addition, the new approach in EEG neurofeedback training (NFT), called the function-specific instruction (FSI) approach, for sports involves providing function-directed verbal instructions to assist individuals to control specific EEG parameters and align them with targeted brain activity features. While this approach was initially hypothesized to aid individuals in attaining a particular mental state during NFT, the impact of EEG-NFT involving Mu rhythm on visuomotor performance, especially when contrasting the traditional instruction (TI) approach with the FSI approach, underscores the necessity for additional exploration. Hence, the objective of this study is to investigate the impact of the FSI approach on modulating Mu rhythm through EEG-NFT in the context of visuomotor performance.

Methods: Thirty novice participants were recruited and divided into three groups: function-specific instruction (FSI, four females, six males; mean age = 27.00 ± 7.13), traditional instruction (TI, five females, five males; mean age = 27.00 ± 3.88), and sham control (SC, five females, five males; mean age = 27.80 ± 5.34). These groups engaged in a single-session EEG-NFT and performed golf putting tasks both before and after the EEG-NFT.

Results: The results showed that within the FSI group, single-session NFT with augmented Mu power led to a significant decrease in putting performance (p = 0.013). Furthermore, we noted a marginal significance indicating a slight increase in Mu power and a reduction in the subjective sensation of action control following EEG-NFT (p = 0.119). While there was a positive correlation between Mu power and mean radial error in golf putting performance (p = 0.043), it is important to interpret this relationship cautiously in the context of reduced accuracy in golf putting.

Discussion: The findings emphasize the necessity for extended investigation to attain a more profound comprehension of the nuanced significance of Mu power in visuomotor performance. The study highlights the potential effectiveness of the FSI approach in EEG-NFT and in enhancing visuomotor performance, but it also emphasizes the potential impact of skill level and attentional control, particularly in complex visuomotor tasks.

Keywords: Mu rhythm; alpha rhythm; complex visuomotor skills; golf putting; mental training; simple visuomotor skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The golf putting task and procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowcharts present neurofeedback training protocols in sitting and standing conditions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Mean relative errors (MREs) for three groups. (B) FSI exhibited performance detriment after EEG-NFT. *p < 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The variation in Mu activity was conducted by subtracting Mu power recorded in the posttest from Mu power recorded in the pretest. Positive value, an increase in Mu activity from the pretest to the posttest; negative value, a decrease in Mu activity from the pretest to the posttest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afrash S., Saemi E., Gong A., Doustan M. (2023). Neurofeedback training and motor learning: the enhanced sensorimotor rhythm protocol is better or the suppressed alpha or the suppressed mu? BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil. 15, 93. 10.1186/s13102-023-00706-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albers C., Lakens D. (2018). When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: inaccurate effect size estimators and follow-up bias. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 74, 187–195. 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.004 - DOI
    1. Algermissen J., Mehler D. M. (2018). May the power be with you: are there highly powered studies in neuroscience, and how can we get more of them? J. Neurophysiol. 119, 2114–2117. 10.1152/jn.00765.2017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aloufi A. E., Rowe F. J., Meyer G. F. (2021). Behavioural performance improvement in visuomotor learning correlates with functional and microstructural brain changes. Neuroimage 227, 117673. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117673 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arns M., Kleinnijenhuis M., Fallahpour K., Breteler R. (2008). Golf performance enhancement and real-life neurofeedback training using personalized event-locked EEG profiles. J. Neurother. 11, 11–18. 10.1080/10874200802149656 - DOI