Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;14(4):943-948.
doi: 10.1007/s13193-023-01833-6. Epub 2023 Oct 11.

Ki-67 Index and Its Correlation with Clinical and Pathological Variables in Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Ki-67 Index and Its Correlation with Clinical and Pathological Variables in Breast Cancer

Giridhar Chidananda Murthy. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

The role of the Ki-67 index as a prognostic marker in breast cancer is controversial. This study was undertaken to assess the association of Ki-67 index with other clinicopathological factors in breast cancer. The prospectively conducted study included 127 female patients with clinical tumor stage 1-3 and nodal stage 0 or 1 treated between March 2015 and March 2017. Ki-67 index was correlated with age, tumor size, lymph node status, histological grade, ER, PR, HER2, and molecular subtypes using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Mean age of the patients was 53.28 years (range, 25-86 years). Mean Ki-67 index was 33.59 (range, 2.5-95). Ki-67 index showed a positive correlation with pathological stage (p=0.025), grade (p=0.0001), and molecular subtype (p=0.0001) of the tumor. It was inversely associated with ER (p=0.0001) and PR status (p=0.0001). Its association with pathological nodal status (p=0.06) and size (p=0.08) of the tumor was not statistically significant. There was no correlation with age (p=0.892) and HER2 status (p=0.287). Association of the Ki-67 index with common prognostic factors such as grade, stage, ER, PR, and molecular subtype suggests its role as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Correlation; Ki-67 index; Prognostic factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe author declares no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. De Azambuja E, Cardoso F, de Castro JG, Colozza M, Mano MS, Durbecq V, et al. Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12,155 patients. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:1504–1513. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603756. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stuart-Harris R, Caldas C, Pinder SE, Pharoah P. Proliferation markers and survival in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies in 32,825 patients. Breast. 2008;17:323–334. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, Norton L, Ravdin P, Taube S, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5287–5312. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2364. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reis-Filho JS, Davidson NE. Ki67 assessment in breast cancer: are we there yet? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113:797–798. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa202. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aung TN, Acs B, Warrell J, Bai Y, Gaule P, Martinez-Morilla S, et al. A new tool for technical standardization of the Ki67 immunohistochemical assay. Mod Pathol. 2021;34:1261–1270. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00745-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources