Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 22:14:1307726.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1307726. eCollection 2023.

Quality of life for people with psychiatric disabilities employed in extended employment programs in two Arab towns in Israel: an exploratory study

Affiliations

Quality of life for people with psychiatric disabilities employed in extended employment programs in two Arab towns in Israel: an exploratory study

Leena Badran et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to examine the quality of life (QOL) for people with psychiatric disabilities who are engaged in extended employment programs (homogeneous versus heterogeneous) in the Arab-populated Triangle Area of Israel. The homogeneous program participants are exclusively Arab while the heterogeneous program includes both Arabs and Jews.

Methods: Quantitative research study of 104 adults with psychiatric disabilities engaged in two communal extended employment programs. Participants completed demographic (age (years), gender, marital status (married, widowed/separated, married, single), religion (Muslim, Jewish, Christian), dichotomous nationality variable (Jewish/Arab), and years of education) and employment questionnaires (length of time in the employment program, number of working days/h and salary satisfaction); SF 12 Scale; and The Personal Wellbeing Index questionnaire. Two-sample T-Test, exploratory factor analysis and multiple linear regressions were conducted for tracking the differences between participants in homogeneous and heterogeneous programs.

Results: A significant difference was found between the programs in two QOL components, insofar as satisfaction with the standard of living, together with health satisfaction were rated higher for participants in the heterogeneous program than for their homogeneous program counterparts. Furthermore, the results indicate that physical health and gender were the most important variables in explaining QOL in both programs, while the employment variables were not significant.

Discussion: Since the research findings show that the employment-related-items aren't significant in predicting the employees' QOL, the definition and suitability of extended employment environments as a mental health service must be reexamined. Cultural elements may also have an impact on QOL when the programs are located in a traditional town, with gender playing a key role. The family's role is pivotal in traditional societies, influencing an individual's ability to participate in employment programs and the support they receive. In patriarchal societies, there can be added pressure on men with psychiatric disabilities to conform to societal expectations. Given the general lack of health awareness in Arab communities, there is a need to develop additional projects or incorporate physical health improvement as a rehabilitation goal when working with individuals with psychiatric disabilities, regardless of the type of community rehabilitation program.

Keywords: Arab minority; community service; extended employment programs; psychiatric disabilities; quality of life; social norms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences in Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) between the heterogeneous and the homogeneous programs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schwartz C, Armony-Sivan R. Students’ attitudes to the inclusion of people with disabilities in the community. Disabil Soc. (2001) 16:403–13. doi: 10.1080/09687590120045978 - DOI
    1. Rosenbaum SA. Restoring voice to people with cognitive disabilities: realizing the right to equal recognition before the law. J Leg Med. (2019) 39:61–74. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2019.1587653 - DOI
    1. Janice C, John B, Alicia O, Myfanwy L, Suzy P. Quality of life of people with mental health problems: a synthesis of qualitative research. Heal Qual Life Outcomes. (2012) 10:1–16. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-138 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berghöfer A, Martin L, Hense S, Weinmann S, Roll S. Quality of life in patients with severe mental illness: a cross-sectional survey in an integrated outpatient health care model. Qual Life Res. (2020) 29:2073–87. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02470-0, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Organization WH (1997) Measuring quality of life: The World Health Organization quality of life instruments. Geneva.