Evaluation of information provided to patients by ChatGPT about chronic diseases in Spanish language
- PMID: 38188865
- PMCID: PMC10768597
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076231224603
Evaluation of information provided to patients by ChatGPT about chronic diseases in Spanish language
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial intelligence has presented exponential growth in medicine. The ChatGPT language model has been highlighted as a possible source of patient information. This study evaluates the reliability and readability of ChatGPT-generated patient information on chronic diseases in Spanish.
Methods: Questions frequently asked by patients on the internet about diabetes mellitus, heart failure, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were submitted to ChatGPT. Reliability was assessed by rating responses as (1) comprehensive, (2) correct but inadequate, (3) some correct and some incorrect, (4) completely incorrect, and divided between "good" (1 and 2) and "bad" (3 and 4). Readability was evaluated with the adapted Flesch and Szigriszt formulas.
Results: And 71.67% of the answers were "good," with none qualified as "completely incorrect." Better reliability was observed in questions on diabetes and RA versus heart failure (p = 0.02). In readability, responses were "moderately difficult" (54.73, interquartile range (IQR) 51.59-58.58), with better results for CKD (median 56.1, IQR 53.5-59.1) and RA (56.4, IQR 53.7-60.7), than for heart failure responses (median 50.6, IQR 46.3-53.8).
Conclusion: Our study suggests that the ChatGPT tool can be a reliable source of information in spanish for patients with chronic diseases with different reliability for some of them, however, it needs to improve the readability of its answers to be recommended as a useful tool for patients.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; chronic diseases; readability; reliability.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Is ChatGPT a Reliable Source of Patient Information on Asthma?Cureus. 2024 Jul 8;16(7):e64114. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64114. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39119408 Free PMC article.
-
A Multidisciplinary Assessment of ChatGPT's Knowledge of Amyloidosis: Observational Study.JMIR Cardio. 2024 Apr 19;8:e53421. doi: 10.2196/53421. JMIR Cardio. 2024. PMID: 38640472 Free PMC article.
-
Appropriateness and Readability of ChatGPT-4-Generated Responses for Surgical Treatment of Retinal Diseases.Ophthalmol Retina. 2023 Oct;7(10):862-868. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.05.022. Epub 2023 Jun 3. Ophthalmol Retina. 2023. PMID: 37277096
-
[What is the potential of ChatGPT for qualified patient information? : Attempt of a structured analysis on the basis of a survey regarding complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in rheumatology].Z Rheumatol. 2025 Apr;84(3):179-187. doi: 10.1007/s00393-024-01535-6. Epub 2024 Jul 10. Z Rheumatol. 2025. PMID: 38985176 Free PMC article. German.
-
Trustworthiness, Value, Danger, and Readability of ChatGPT-Generated Responses to Health Questions Related to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Cureus. 2024 Oct 14;16(10):e71472. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71472. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39544545 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comprehensiveness of Large Language Models in Patient Queries on Gingival and Endodontic Health.Int Dent J. 2025 Feb;75(1):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.06.022. Epub 2024 Aug 14. Int Dent J. 2025. PMID: 39147663 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial Intelligence in Peripheral Artery Disease Education: A Battle Between ChatGPT and Google Gemini.Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85174. eCollection 2025 Jun. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40600083 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence-based chatbot assistance in clinical decision-making for medically complex patients in oral surgery: a comparative study.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05732-w. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40055745 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the readability, quality, and reliability of responses generated by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity on the most commonly asked questions about Ankylosing spondylitis.PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0326351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326351. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40531978 Free PMC article.
-
ChatGPT 3.5 Better Improves Comprehensibility of English, than Spanish, Generated Responses to Osteosarcoma Questions.J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;131(8):1692-1695. doi: 10.1002/jso.28109. Epub 2025 Feb 3. J Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39898783 Free PMC article.
References
-
- IBM. What is artificial intelligence? [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.ibm.com/topics/artificial-intelligence
-
- Fox S. Online Health Search 2006 [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2022 Feb 26]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2006/10/29/online-health-search-2006/
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials