COVID-19 vaccine refusal as unfair free-riding
- PMID: 38189907
- PMCID: PMC10904454
- DOI: 10.1007/s11019-023-10188-2
COVID-19 vaccine refusal as unfair free-riding
Abstract
Contributions to COVID-19 vaccination programmes promise valuable collective goods. They can support public and individual health by creating herd immunity and taking the pressure off overwhelmed public health services; support freedom of movement by enabling governments to remove restrictive lockdown policies; and improve economic and social well-being by allowing businesses, schools, and other essential public services to re-open. The vaccinated can contribute to the production of these goods. The unvaccinated, who benefit from, but who do not contribute to these goods can be morally criticised as free-riders. In this paper defends the claim that in the case of COVID-19, the unvaccinated are unfair free-riders. I defend the claim against two objections. First, that they are not unfair free-riders because they lack the subjective attitudes and intentions of free-riders; second, that although the unvaccinated may be free-riders, their free-riding is not unfair.
Keywords: COVID-19; Fairness; Free-riding; Vaccine hesitancy; Vaccines.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None.
References
-
- Arneson Richard J. The principle of fairness and free-rider problems. Ethics. 1982;92(4):616–633. doi: 10.1086/292379. - DOI
-
- BBC. 2021. COVID report: What is herd immunity? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/57229390. Accessed 09 June 2023
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
