Importance of continuity of care from a patient perspective - a cross-sectional study in Swedish health care
- PMID: 38189945
- PMCID: PMC10851828
- DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2299119
Importance of continuity of care from a patient perspective - a cross-sectional study in Swedish health care
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the patients' view on continuity of care (CoC), including preference for a certain general practitioner (GP) and importance and access to a regular general practitioner (RGP).
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Primary care center in Halland County, in the western part of Sweden.
Subjects: Patients ≥18 years old and having at least one appointment at the primary care center during October-December 2022.
Main outcome measures: Preference for a certain GP and importance of and accessibility for an RGP.
Results: The study included 404 patients. Importance of having an RGP was considered by 86% of the patients. Preference for a certain GP was thought by 73% of the patients, and when asked as a bivariate question, 69% considered having an RGP. Both the importance of an RGP and preference for a certain GP were more often considered by patients ≥65 years (p < .0001). Regarding accessibility, 67% of the patients reported having access to their RGP 'always/most of the time or a lot of the time' and 62% reported seeing their RGP at last visit.
Conclusions: In conclusion, this study showed that the majority of patients value CoC in terms of importance of having an RGP. Older patients were more likely to have a preference for a certain GP. Two-third of the patients succeeded in seeing their RGP always or a lot of the time. The results in this study provide evidence that CoC is important for most patients, regardless of age and gender.Key pointsPrevious studies have showed that continuity of care (CoC) is important regarding mortality and morbidity. In primary care, there is a current debate regarding CoC, accessibility and the strive for CoC. This study showed that the majority of patients, regardless of age and gender, value CoC and consider it being important. However, there was a statistically significant difference regarding age, where patients above 65 years old thought it was more important to have a regular general practitioner and more often had a preference for a certain GP.
Keywords: Continuity of care; family practice; general practice; general practitioner; primary health care.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Similar articles
-
Reasons for attending a general emergency outpatient clinic versus a regular general practitioner - a survey among immigrant and native walk-in patients in Oslo, Norway.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017 Mar;35(1):35-45. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1288817. Epub 2017 Feb 28. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017. PMID: 28277057 Free PMC article.
-
Association between continuity of care in Swedish primary care and emergency services utilisation: a population-based cross-sectional study.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017 Jun;35(2):113-119. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1333303. Epub 2017 Jun 9. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017. PMID: 28598752 Free PMC article.
-
Continuity of care, measurement and association with hospital admission and mortality: a registry-based longitudinal cohort study.BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e051958. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051958. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34857569 Free PMC article.
-
Continuity of care for acutely unwell older adults from nursing homes.Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Jun;20(2):122-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00388.x. Scand J Caring Sci. 2006. PMID: 16756517 Review.
-
Continuity of health care: measurement and application in two rural counties of Guangxi Province, China.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):917. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09916-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37644426 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Multimorbidity and patient experience with general practice: A national cross-sectional survey in Norway.BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 10;25(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02495-1. BMC Prim Care. 2024. PMID: 38987692 Free PMC article.
-
On sustainability and low value care.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Jun;42(2):235-236. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2321525. Epub 2024 Feb 28. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024. PMID: 38416128 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Exploring Men's Experiences of Engagement With General Practice: A Qualitative Study.J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251318447. doi: 10.1177/21501319251318447. J Prim Care Community Health. 2025. PMID: 39912703 Free PMC article.
-
Large Variation in Adherence to Diagnostic Guidelines in Hypertension Management in Swedish Primary Healthcare.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Jun;27(6):e70079. doi: 10.1111/jch.70079. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025. PMID: 40551572 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of Follow-Up Care Frequency on the Glycemic Control of Diabetic Patients in Qassim, Saudi Arabia.Cureus. 2025 Jul 13;17(7):e87842. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87842. eCollection 2025 Jul. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40799855 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mainous AG 3rd, Baker R, Love MM, et al. . Continuity of care and trust in one’s physician: evidence from primary care in the United States and the United Kingdom. Fam Med. 2001;33(1):22–27. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources