Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Feb;177(2):165-176.
doi: 10.7326/M23-1754. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

Real-World Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Against Infection and Severe Diseases in Children and Adolescents

Affiliations
Observational Study

Real-World Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Against Infection and Severe Diseases in Children and Adolescents

Qiong Wu et al. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of the BNT162b2 vaccine in pediatrics was assessed by randomized trials before the Omicron variant's emergence. The long-term durability of vaccine protection in this population during the Omicron period remains limited.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of BNT162b2 in preventing infection and severe diseases with various strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in previously uninfected children and adolescents.

Design: Comparative effectiveness research accounting for underreported vaccination in 3 study cohorts: adolescents (12 to 20 years) during the Delta phase and children (5 to 11 years) and adolescents (12 to 20 years) during the Omicron phase.

Setting: A national collaboration of pediatric health systems (PEDSnet).

Participants: 77 392 adolescents (45 007 vaccinated) during the Delta phase and 111 539 children (50 398 vaccinated) and 56 080 adolescents (21 180 vaccinated) during the Omicron phase.

Intervention: First dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine versus no receipt of COVID-19 vaccine.

Measurements: Outcomes of interest include documented infection, COVID-19 illness severity, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), and cardiac complications. The effectiveness was reported as (1-relative risk)*100, with confounders balanced via propensity score stratification.

Results: During the Delta period, the estimated effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine was 98.4% (95% CI, 98.1% to 98.7%) against documented infection among adolescents, with no statistically significant waning after receipt of the first dose. An analysis of cardiac complications did not suggest a statistically significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. During the Omicron period, the effectiveness against documented infection among children was estimated to be 74.3% (CI, 72.2% to 76.2%). Higher levels of effectiveness were seen against moderate or severe COVID-19 (75.5% [CI, 69.0% to 81.0%]) and ICU admission with COVID-19 (84.9% [CI, 64.8% to 93.5%]). Among adolescents, the effectiveness against documented Omicron infection was 85.5% (CI, 83.8% to 87.1%), with 84.8% (CI, 77.3% to 89.9%) against moderate or severe COVID-19, and 91.5% (CI, 69.5% to 97.6%) against ICU admission with COVID-19. The effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against the Omicron variant declined 4 months after the first dose and then stabilized. The analysis showed a lower risk for cardiac complications in the vaccinated group during the Omicron variant period.

Limitation: Observational study design and potentially undocumented infection.

Conclusion: This study suggests that BNT162b2 was effective for various COVID-19-related outcomes in children and adolescents during the Delta and Omicron periods, and there is some evidence of waning effectiveness over time.

Primary funding source: National Institutes of Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M23-1754.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Selection of participants for the three study cohorts evaluating the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine in preventing infection with SARS-CoV-2 in (Study cohort 1) adolescents aged 12-20 years during the period when the Delta variant was prevalent, (Study cohort 2) children aged 5 to 11 years and (Study cohort 3) adolescents aged 12 to 20 years during the period when the Omicron variant was prevalent.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Stratified effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine in preventing infection with SARS-CoV-2 in children and adolescents by 2-month intervals since receipt of the first dose

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Flaxman S, Whittaker C, Semenova E, Rashid T, Parks RM, Blenkinsop A, et al. Assessment of COVID-19 as the Underlying Cause of Death Among Children and Young People Aged 0 to 19 Years in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. Jan 30;6(1):e2253590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frenck RW, Klein NP, Kitchin N, Gurtman A, Absalon J, Lockhart S, et al. Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Adolescents. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021. Jul 15;385(3):239–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walter EB, Talaat KR, Sabharwal C, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, Paulsen GC, et al. Evaluation of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Children 5 to 11 Years of Age. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022. Jan 6;386(1):35–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chemaitelly H, AlMukdad S, Ayoub HH, Altarawneh HN, Coyle P, Tang P, et al. Covid-19 Vaccine Protection among Children and Adolescents in Qatar. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022;387(20). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen-Stavi CJ, Magen O, Barda N, Yaron S, Peretz A, Netzer D, et al. BNT162b2 Vaccine Effectiveness against Omicron in Children 5 to 11 Years of Age. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022. Jul 21;387(3):227–36. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types