Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jan 9;25(1):18.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02256-6.

General practice staff and patient experiences of a multicomponent intervention for people at high risk of poor health outcomes: a qualitative study

Sara Javanparast  1 , Leigh Roeger  1 , Richard L Reed  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

General practice staff and patient experiences of a multicomponent intervention for people at high risk of poor health outcomes: a qualitative study

Sara Javanparast et al. BMC Prim Care. .

Abstract

Background: This study reports the experiences of general practice staff and patients at high risk of poor health outcomes who took part in a clustered randomised controlled trial of a multicomponent general practice intervention. The intervention comprised patient enrolment to a preferred General Practitioner (GP) to promote continuity of care, access to longer GP appointments, and timely general practice follow-up after hospital care episodes. The aims of the study were to better understand participant's (practice staff and patients) perspectives of the intervention, their views on whether the intervention had improved general practice services, reduced hospital admissions and finally whether they believed the intervention would be sustainable after the trial had completed.

Methods: A qualitative study design with semi-structured interviews was employed. The practice staff sample was drawn from both the control and intervention groups. The patient sample was drawn from those who had expressed an interest in taking part in an interview during the trial and who had also experienced a recent hospital care episode.

Results: Interviews were conducted with 41 practice staff and 45 patients. Practice staff and patients expressed support for the value of appointments with a regular GP and having sufficient time in appointments for the provision of comprehensive care. There were mixed views with respect to the extent to which the intervention had improved services. The positive changes reported were related to services being provided in a more proactive, thorough, and systematic manner with a greater emphasis on team based care involving the Practice Nurse. Patients nominated after hours care and financial considerations as the key reasons for seeking hospital care. Practice staff noted that the intervention would be difficult to sustain financially in the absence of additional funding.

Conclusions: The multicomponent intervention was supported by practice staff and patients and some patients perceived that it had led to improvements in care.

Keywords: Australia; Chronic disease; Continuity of care; GP appointment length; GP follow-up; Health services; Qualitative study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Australian Government Department of Health. Future focused primary health care: Australia’s Primary Health 10 Year Plan 2022-2032. 2022. Available from https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australias-primary-heal... Accessed 24 Nov 2023.
    1. Polin K, Hjortland M, Maresso A, van Ginneken E, Busse R, Quentin W. Top-three health reforms in 31 high-income countries in 2018 and 2019: an expert informed overview. Health Policy. 2021;125(7):815–32. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marchildon GP, Brammli-Greenberg S, Dayan M, De Belvis AG, Gandré C, Isaksson D, Kroneman M, Neuner-Jehle S, Saunes IS, Thomas S, et al. Achieving higher performing primary care through patient registration: a review of twelve high-income countries. Health Policy. 2021;125(12):1507–16. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.09.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalucy L, Katterl R, Jackson-Bowers E et al. Models of patient enrolment (PHC RIS Policy Issue Review). Adelaide: Primary Health Care Research and Information Service, 2009. Available from https://dspace2.flinders.edu.au/xmlui/bitstream/handle/2328/26593/PIR%20....pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Accessed 24 Nov 2023.
    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Patient experiences in Australia: Summary of findings., 2016–17. ABS, 2017. Available from https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4839.0. Main+Features 12016-17? Open Document Accessed 24 Nov 2023.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources