Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 8;14(1):777.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51223-3.

Oral health-related quality of life and survival analysis after preventive and restorative treatment of molar-incisor hypomineralisation

Affiliations

Oral health-related quality of life and survival analysis after preventive and restorative treatment of molar-incisor hypomineralisation

Caroline Sekundo et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in children and adolescents, including information on restorative care, tooth sensitivity, as well as sociodemographic factors. Thirty-five patients aged between 7 and 17 years underwent a comprehensive oral examination. Severity of MIH was graded using the MIH Treatment Need Index (MIH-TNI), OHRQoL using the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP-19). Clinical quality of restorations was assessed according to modified FDI-criteria, tooth sensitivity using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale (SCASS). The mean age was 11.3 ± 3.0 years, 34% were female. On average, 6.9 ± 2.8 teeth were affected, 62,9% had hypersensitive teeth (SCASS ≥ 1). Eighty-nine percent of patients had received restorative care, with a mean of 3.3 ± 2.1 teeth restored, most often with composite, followed by fissure sealing. Nine percent of restorations failed by the FDI-criteria. Mean estimated survival times for success were 4.9 years (95% CI 3.5; 6.2) and 5.6 years (95% CI 5.0; 6.3) for fissure sealants and composite restorations, respectively. The mean COHIP-19 score was 64.3 ± 8.2 (max. possible score = 76). A higher severity of MIH-TNI correlated significantly with impaired OHRQoL (rs = - 0.38, p = 0.013). However, this was not mirrored in multiple regression analysis. Despite the high rate of restorative treatment with an acceptable failure rate, OHRQoL is reduced in children with MIH. Many teeth affected by MIH remain sensitive. Further studies are needed to assess the benefits of different restorative options.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of MIH-severity according to the MIH-TNI Index.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of composite restorations on MIH-affected teeth. (AC) Clinically acceptable composite restorations (clinically very good—clinically acceptable depending on the domains of the modified FDI criteria); (A) lower left first molar, follow-up 1.5 years; (B) upper right first molar, follow-up 7 years; (C) upper LEFT first molar, follow-up 7 years; (DF) clinically inacceptable composite restorations (clinically unsatisfactory); (D) lower right first molar, follow-up 4 years, unsatisfactory marginal adaptation; (E) lower left first molar, follow-up 4.5 years, unsatisfactory marginal adaptation and presence of caries at restoration margin; (F) lower left first molar, follow-up 4 years, unsatisfactory marginal adaptation and presence of caries at restoration margin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curve of 27 fissure sealings and 67 composite restorations on teeth affected by MIH (A) complete success (B) including success with repair.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weerheijm KL, Jälevik B, Alaluusua S. Molar-incisor hypomineralisation. Caries Res. 2001;35:390–391. doi: 10.1159/000047479. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mast P, Rodrigueztapia MT, Daeniker L, Krejci I. Understanding MIH: Definition, epidemiology, differential diagnosis and new treatment guidelines. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2013;14:204–208. - PubMed
    1. Silva MJ, Scurrah KJ, Craig JM, Manton DJ, Kilpatrick N. Etiology of molar incisor hypomineralization—a systematic review. Community Dent. Oral. Epidemiol. 2016;44:342–353. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12229. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jälevik B. Prevalence and diagnosis of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH): A systematic review. Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent. 2010;11:59–64. doi: 10.1007/BF03262714. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao D, Dong B, Yu D, Ren Q, Sun Y. The prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralization: Evidence from 70 studies. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2018;28:170–179. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12323. - DOI - PubMed

Substances