Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;57(4):879-891.
doi: 10.1002/eat.24134. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

Affective processes underlying restrictive eating in atypical anorexia nervosa: Comparisons to anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa using ecological momentary assessment

Affiliations

Affective processes underlying restrictive eating in atypical anorexia nervosa: Comparisons to anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa using ecological momentary assessment

Ege Biçaker et al. Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Certain symptom and risk/maintenance factor similarities between individuals with atypical anorexia nervosa (AN) and 'typical' AN have been documented, but few studies have investigated how atypical AN compares to bulimia nervosa (BN). Further, the role of affective mechanisms in maintaining restrictive eating in atypical AN has not been examined. The current study investigated whether atypical AN resembles AN and/or BN on affect-related processes using questionnaires and ecological momentary assessment (EMA).

Method: Women with atypical AN (n = 24), AN-restrictive subtype, (n = 27), AN-binge eating/purging subtype (n = 34), and BN (n = 58) completed questionnaires measuring depressive symptoms and emotion regulation difficulties. They also completed a 14-day EMA protocol during which they reported negative and positive affect and skipped meals five times/day (signal-contingent surveys) and restrictive eating after meals/snacks (event-contingent surveys).

Results: Diagnostic groups generally did not differ on questionnaire measures nor affective patterns surrounding restrictive eating behaviors. Momentary changes in affect did not predict or follow restriction at meals/snacks, though higher momentary negative affect ratings predicted skipped meals, and higher positive affect was reported after skipped meals. Greater average negative affect and lower average positive affect predicted both restrictive eating behaviors.

Discussion: Across diagnoses, reductions in food intake do not appear to be influenced by momentary changes in affect, though skipping meals may serve an emotion regulation function. Atypical AN seems to resemble AN and BN on affective processes underlying restrictive eating, raising further questions regarding the unique diagnosis of atypical AN.

Public significance: Though atypical anorexia appears to strongly resemble anorexia nervosa, it is less clear how this disorder relates to bulimia nervosa. It is further unknown whether affective-related processes underlie restrictive eating in atypical anorexia nervosa, and how these processes compare to those in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Results suggest that atypical anorexia does not differ from anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa on emotion-related measures, nor in affective patterns surrounding restrictive eating behaviors.

Keywords: affect regulation; anorexia nervosa; atypical anorexia nervosa; bulimia nervosa; ecological momentary assessment; restrictive eating.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
    1. Berg, K. C., Crosby, R. D., Cao, L., Crow, S. J., Engel, S. G., Wonderlich, S. A., & Peterson, C. B. (2015). Negative affect prior to and following overeating‐only, loss of control eating‐only, and binge eating episodes in obese adults. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48(6), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22401
    1. Bohn, K., & Fairburn, C. G. (2008). The Clinical Impairment Assessment Questionnaire (CIA 3.0). In C. G. Fairburn (Ed.), Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. Guilford Press.
    1. Bohon, C., & Stice, E. (2017). Eating disorder diagnostic scale. In T. Wade (Ed.), Encyclopedia of feeding and eating disorders (pp. 254–257). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-104-6_109
    1. Brennan, C., Illingworth, S., Cini, E., & Bhakta, D. (2023). Medical instability in typical and atypical adolescent anorexia nervosa: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Eating Disorders, 11(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00779-y

LinkOut - more resources