Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;27(1):e14357.
doi: 10.1111/ele.14357. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

A grazer's niche edge is associated with increasing diet diversity and poor population performance

Affiliations

A grazer's niche edge is associated with increasing diet diversity and poor population performance

J A Britnell et al. Ecol Lett. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

The core-periphery hypothesis predicts niche cores should be associated with greater survivorship, reproductive output and population performance rates than marginal habitats at niche edges. However, there is very little empirical evidence of whether niche centrality influences population trends in animals. Using the Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra) as a model system, we evaluated whether niche centrality is associated with population trends, resource availability and diet across a core-periphery gradient. Population growth rates and density progressively declined towards niche peripheries. Niche peripheries were resource-poor and Cape mountain zebra consumed more phylogenetically diverse diets dominated by non-grass families. In core habitats they consumed grass-rich diets and female reproductive success was higher. This combination of spatial niche modelling and functional ecology provides a novel evaluation of how bottom-up resource limitation can shape species distributions, population resilience and range change and can guide conservation management.

Keywords: core-periphery; fitness; metabarcoding; population-dynamics; population-limitation; protected areas.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Barbour, M.G., Burk, J.H. & Pitts, W.D. (1980) Terrestrial plant ecology. Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.
    1. Barnett, D., Arts, I. & Penders, J. (2021) microViz: an R package for microbiome data visualization and statistics. Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3201.
    1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48.
    1. Beltran, R.S., Hernandez, K.M., Condit, R., Robinson, P.W., Crocker, D.E., Goetsch, C. et al. (2023) Physiological tipping points in the relationship between foraging success and lifetime fitness of a long-lived mammal. Ecology Letters, 26, 706-716.
    1. Boshoff, A., Landman, M. & Kerley, G.I.H. (2016) Filling the gaps on the maps: historical distribution patterns of some larger mammals in part of southern Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 71, 23-87.

LinkOut - more resources