Effect of Volatile Anesthesia Versus Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 38195081
- DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006814
Effect of Volatile Anesthesia Versus Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Background: The effect of intraoperative anesthetic regimen on pulmonary outcome after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is yet undetermined. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of volatile anesthesia (sevoflurane or desflurane) compared with propofol-based intravenous anesthesia on pulmonary complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Methods: Patients scheduled for minimally invasive esophagectomy were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 general anesthetic regimens (sevoflurane, desflurane, or propofol). The primary outcome was the incidence of pulmonary complications within the 7 days postoperatively, which was a collapsed composite end point, including respiratory infection, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, atelectasis, respiratory failure, bronchospasm, pulmonary embolism, and aspiration pneumonitis. The severity of pulmonary complications, surgery-related complications, and other secondary outcomes were also assessed.
Results: Of 647 patients assessed for eligibility, 558 were randomized, and 553 were analyzed. A total of 185 patients were assigned to the sevoflurane group, 185 in the desflurane, and 183 in the propofol group. Patients receiving a volatile anesthetic (sevoflurane or desflurane) had a significantly lower incidence (36.5% vs 47.5%; odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.91; P = .013) and lower severity grade of pulmonary complications ( P = .035) compared to the patients receiving propofol. There were no statistically significant differences in other secondary outcomes between the 2 groups.
Conclusions: In patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy, the use of volatile anesthesia (sevoflurane or desflurane) resulted in the reduced risk and severity of pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days as compared to propofol-based intravenous anesthesia.
Copyright © 2024 International Anesthesia Research Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Comparative Effect of Propofol and Volatile Anesthetics on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Lung Resection Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Anesth Analg. 2021 Oct 1;133(4):949-957. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005334. Anesth Analg. 2021. PMID: 33410611 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia versus Volatile Anesthesia with Sevoflurane for Postoperative Delirium in Adult Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blinded Study.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 Sep;38(9):1932-1940. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.05.027. Epub 2024 May 23. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024. PMID: 38987101 Clinical Trial.
-
Respiratory complications after oesophagectomy using volatile or intravenous anaesthesia.Br J Surg. 2025 Mar 28;112(4):znaf052. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf052. Br J Surg. 2025. PMID: 40156890
-
Anesthesia and Long-term Oncological Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Anesth Analg. 2021 Mar 1;132(3):623-634. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005237. Anesth Analg. 2021. PMID: 33105278
-
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in the Elderly: A Review Comparing the Effects of Desflurane and Sevflurane.J Perianesth Nurs. 2018 Oct;33(5):732-740. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Sep 12. J Perianesth Nurs. 2018. PMID: 30236581 Review.
References
-
- Klevebro F, Elliott JA, Slaman A, et al. Cardiorespiratory comorbidity and postoperative complications following esophagectomy: a European multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:2864–2873.
-
- Booka E, Takeuchi H, Suda K, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of postoperative complications on survival after oesophagectomy for cancer. BJS Open. 2018;2:276–284.
-
- Seesing MFJ, Gisbertz SS, Goense L, et al. A propensity score matched analysis of open versus minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy in the Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2017;266:839–846.
-
- Tsunoda S, Obama K, Hisamori S, et al. Lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications following robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: propensity score-matched comparison to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:639–647.
-
- Bhayani NH, Gupta A, Dunst CM, Kurian AA, Reavis KM, Swanstrom LL. Esophagectomies with thoracic incisions carry increased pulmonary morbidity. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:733–738.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical