Physiological and locomotor variations of 3v3 and 5v5 small-sided games soccer formats: A 4-month study on sedentary young adults
- PMID: 38196181
- PMCID: PMC10777774
- DOI: 10.1177/00368504231224606
Physiological and locomotor variations of 3v3 and 5v5 small-sided games soccer formats: A 4-month study on sedentary young adults
Abstract
The objectives of this study were twofold: (a) to analyze the variability of 3v3 and 5v5 small-sided games (SSG) formats in sedentary young adults, and (b) to compare the physiological and locomotor demands of 3v3 and 5v5 SSG formats while considering variations based on sex. The study followed a longitudinal design over 4 months. Thirty sedentary young adults with a mean age of 20.2 ± 1.0 years, height of 1.67 ± 0.06 m, and body mass of 86.3 ± 11.8 kg were included in the study. The participants engaged in 3v3 and 5v5 SSG formats, with each format being played 10 times per month. During each session, heart rate (HR), rate of perceived exertion (RPE), and total distance were measured and analyzed. The within-player variability for HR ranged from a minimum of 1.6% to a maximum of 2.8% (considering the levels at each month), while the between-players variability for HR ranged from a minimum of 1.4% to a maximum of 2.6% (considering the levels at each month). Similar variability patterns were observed for the other outcomes. In terms of comparisons between the formats, the 3v3 format resulted in higher RPE than the 5v5 format for both male (p = 0.006) and female (p = 0.628) participants, as well as for the other outcome measures. In summary, these findings highlight the reproducibility of physiological responses in 3v3 and 5v5 SSG among sedentary individuals. Notably, the 3v3 format consistently induced higher RPE levels. These findings underscore the importance of programming SSG based on sex and format preferences for optimizing exercise outcomes in sedentary.
Keywords: football; recreational populations; small-sided games; variability.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Analyzing the within and between Players Variability of Heart Rate and Locomotor Responses in Small-Sided Soccer Games Performed Repeatedly over a Week.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 28;10(8):1412. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081412. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36011069 Free PMC article.
-
Movement pattern and physiological response in recreational small-sided football - effect of number of players with a fixed pitch size.J Sports Sci. 2018 Jul;36(13):1549-1556. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1402552. Epub 2017 Nov 13. J Sports Sci. 2018. PMID: 29132263
-
Physiological response and activity profile in recreational small-sided football: no effect of the number of players.Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Aug;24 Suppl 1:130-7. doi: 10.1111/sms.12232. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014. PMID: 24944137 Clinical Trial.
-
Recreational Football and Bone Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2022 Dec;52(12):3021-3037. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01726-8. Epub 2022 Jul 19. Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 35852769
-
Quantifying Exposure and Intra-Individual Reliability of High-Speed and Sprint Running During Sided-Games Training in Soccer Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2023 Feb;53(2):371-413. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01773-1. Epub 2022 Nov 4. Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 36331702 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Coito N, Davids K, Folgado H, et al. Capturing and quantifying tactical behaviors in small-sided and conditioned games in soccer: a systematic review. Res Q Exercise Sport 2022; 93: 189–203. - PubMed
-
- Clemente F, Chen Y, Bezerra J, et al. Between-format differences and variability of technical actions during small-sided soccer games played by young players. Human Mov 2018; 2018: 114–120.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources