Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 8;4(4):538-545.
doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0018IN. eCollection 2023 Dec.

A Quality Improvement Approach to Modification of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum

Affiliations

A Quality Improvement Approach to Modification of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum

Tiffany A Gardner et al. ATS Sch. .

Abstract

Background: There is increasing emphasis on resident involvement in quality improvement (QI) efforts, yet resident engagement in QI has remained low for many reasons. Although QI methods are classically applied to clinical processes, there are many opportunities to incorporate QI principles into curricular design and implementation.

Objective: Demonstrate the utility of QI methods when applied to curricular design and the implementation of a novel point-of-care ultrasound portfolio development and quality assurance program at a large internal medicine residency program.

Methods: We applied foundational QI methods, including process mapping, plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, time-trap identification, run-chart analysis, and qualitative interviews throughout the curricular design and implementation phases to rapidly identify areas for improvement and perform timely tests of change.

Results: Fifty-one interns participated in the curriculum, submitting 731 images in the first trimester. Process mapping and submission review revealed that 29% of images were saved to the incorrect digital archive. Resident-reviewer interpretation concordance was present in 80.7% of submissions. In 95.2% of completed quality assurance cards, the same information was provided in the commentary feedback and the evaluator's checklists, representing a time trap. Interventions included restricting access to image archives and removing redundant fields from quality assurance cards. The time to feedback fell from 69.5 to 6.5 days, demonstrating nonrandom variation via run-chart analysis.

Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates the successful application of QI methods to a novel point-of-care ultrasound curriculum. The systematic use of these methodologies in curricular design and implementation allows expeditious curricular improvement. Emphasizing the relevance of QI methods to subject matter beyond clinical processes may increase resident engagement in QI efforts.

Keywords: POCUS; internal medicine; point-of-care ultrasound; quality improvement; residency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
POCUS portfolio development process map. POCUS = point-of-care ultrasound; QA = quality assurance.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Run chart: time to feedback for consecutive worksheet submissions. PDSA = plan–do–study–act.

References

    1. Soni NJ, Schnobrich D, Mathews BK, Tierney DM, Jensen TP, Dancel R, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound for hospitalists: a position statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med . 2019;14:E1–E6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. LoPresti CM, Schnobrich D, Novak W, Fondahn E, Bardowell R, O’Connor AB, et al. Current point of care ultrasound use and training among internal medicine residency programs from the 2020 APDIM Program Director’s Survey. Am J Med . 2022;135:397–404. - PubMed
    1. American College of Physicians. https://www.acponline.org/meetings-courses/focused-topics/point-of-care-...
    1. Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med . 2011;364:749–757. - PubMed
    1. Moore C.2018. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/safety-considerations-building-point-...

LinkOut - more resources