Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2350522.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50522.

Concordance in Medical Urgency Classification of Discharge Diagnoses and Reasons for Visit

Affiliations

Concordance in Medical Urgency Classification of Discharge Diagnoses and Reasons for Visit

Theodoros V Giannouchos et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Current policies to divert emergency department (ED) visits for less medically urgent conditions to more cost-effective settings rely on retrospective adjudication of discharge diagnoses. However, patients present to the ED with concerns, making it challenging for clinicians.

Objective: To characterize ED visits based on the medical urgency of the presenting reasons for visit and to explore the concordance between discharge diagnoses and reasons for visit.

Design, setting, and participants: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, a nationwide sample of ED visits by adults (aged ≥18 years) in the US from the 2018 and 2019 calendar years' ED data of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was used. An algorithm to probabilistically assign ED visits into medical urgency categories based on the presenting reason for visit was developed. A 3-step, look-back method was applied using an updated version of the New York University ED algorithm, and a map of all possible discharge diagnoses to the same reasons for visit was developed. Analyses were conducted in July and August 2023.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was probabilistic medical urgency classification of reasons for visits and discharge diagnoses and their concordance.

Results: We analyzed 27 068 ED visits (mean age, 48.2% years [95% CI, 47.5%-48.9% years]) representing 190.7 million visits nationwide. Women (mean, 57.0% [95% CI, 55.9%-58.1%]) and patients with public health insurance coverage, including Medicare (mean, 24.9% [95% CI, 21.9%-28.0%]) and Medicaid (mean, 25.1% [95% CI, 21.0%-29.2%]), accounted for the largest share of ED visits, and a mean of 13.2% (95% CI, 11.4%-15.0%) of all visits resulted in a hospital admission. Overall, about 38.5% and 53.9% of all ED visits were classified with 100% and 75% probabilities, respectively, as injury related, emergency care needed, emergent but primary care treatable, nonemergent, or mental health or substance use disorders related based on discharge diagnosis compared with 0.4% and 12.4%, respectively, of all encounters based on patients' reason for visit. Among discharge diagnoses assigned with high certainty to only 1 urgency category using the New York University ED algorithm, between 38.0% (95% CI, 36.3%-39.6%) and 57.4% (95% CI, 56.0%-58.8%) aligned with the probabilistic categorical assignments of their corresponding reasons for visit.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study of 190.7 million ED visits among adults aged 18 years or older, a smaller percentage of reasons for visit could be prospectively categorized with high accuracy to a specific medical urgency category compared with all visits based on discharge diagnoses, and a limited concordance between reasons for visit and discharge diagnoses was found. Alternative methods are needed to identify the medical necessity of ED encounters more accurately.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Algorithm for Probabilistic Classification of Emergency Department (ED) Visits by Medical Urgency Based on Reasons for Visit
NHAMCS indicates National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; NYU, New York University; PCT, primary care treatable.

Comment in

References

    1. Rubin R. The costs of US emergency department visits. JAMA. 2021;325(4):333-333. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.26936 - DOI - PubMed
    1. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics . Emergency department visit rates by selected characteristics: United States, 2020. Accessed July 5, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db452.htm
    1. Galarraga JE, Pines JM. Costs of ED episodes of care in the United States. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(3):357-365. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2015.06.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uscher-Pines L, Pines J, Kellermann A, Gillen E, Mehrotra A. Emergency department visits for nonurgent conditions: systematic literature review. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(1):47-59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnston KJ, Allen L, Melanson TA, Pitts SR. A “patch” to the NYU emergency department visit algorithm. Health Serv Res. 2017;52(4):1264-1276. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12638 - DOI - PMC - PubMed