Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 3;111(1):znad347.
doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad347.

Natural language processing to automate a web-based model of care and modernize skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings

Affiliations

Natural language processing to automate a web-based model of care and modernize skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings

Stephen R Ali et al. Br J Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings are under intense pressure to reform given the rapidly rising incidence of cancer and national mandates for protocolized streaming of cases. The aim of this study was to validate a natural language processing (NLP)-based web platform to automate evidence-based MDT decisions for skin cancer with basal cell carcinoma as a use case.

Methods: A novel and validated NLP information extraction model was used to extract perioperative tumour and surgical factors from histopathology reports. A web application with a bespoke application programming interface used data from this model to provide an automated clinical decision support system, mapped to national guidelines and generating a patient letter to communicate ongoing management. Performance was assessed against retrospectively derived recommendations by two independent and blinded expert clinicians.

Results: There were 893 patients (1045 lesions) used to internally validate the model. High accuracy was observed when compared against human predictions, with an overall value of 0.92. Across all classifiers the virtual skin MDT was highly specific (0.96), while sensitivity was lower (0.72).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a fully automated, virtual, web-based service model to host the skin MDT with good system performance. This platform could be used to support clinical decision-making during MDTs as 'human in the loop' approach to aid protocolized streaming. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the model in tumour types where guidelines are more complex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this article would like to disclose that SRA, TDD, and ISW have a patent pending in the United Kingdom with patent application number GB2312829.1. This patent is titled ‘Method and System for Providing an Evidence-Based Protocolised Recommendation.’ We acknowledge this potential conflict of interest and affirm that it does not influence the content, data interpretation, or findings presented in this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic representation of the virtual skin MDT

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ali SR, Dobbs TD, Hutchings HA, Whitaker IS. Composition, quoracy and cost of specialist skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the United Kingdom. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74:3335–3340 - PubMed
    1. British Medical Association . NHS medical staffing data analysis. Available from: https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/nhs-delivery-and-workforce/wor... (last accessed 3 April 2023)
    1. Cancer Research UK . Melanoma skin cancer statistics. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/s... (last accessed 3 April 2023)
    1. Cancer Research UK . Non-melanoma skin cancer statistics. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/s... (last accessed 3 April 2023)
    1. Keohane SG, Botting J, Budny PG, Dolan OM, Fife K, Harwood CAet al. . British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of people with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 2020. Br J Dermatol 2021;184:401–414 - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding