Implementation of health technologies in Brazil: analysis of federal guidelines for the public health system
- PMID: 38198316
- DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232024291.00322023
Implementation of health technologies in Brazil: analysis of federal guidelines for the public health system
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the regulatory framework and federal guidelines that support the process of implementing health technologies in the Unified Health System (SUS) through analysis of documents and legislation related to the National Health Technology Management Policy, published between 2009 and 2021. The search and selection of documents and subsequent data extraction were carried out. The documents were grouped into three categories: structural regulatory documents, recommendations on evaluation of technologies, and recommendations on clinical guidelines. In 38.8% of the regulatory documents, citations to implementation related mainly to SUS clinical guidelines were identified; however, no document dedicated to guiding implementation actions was identified. Recommendations related to implementations were identified in 27.1% of the reports and 66.1% of the guidelines, although without standardization and, in general, in little detail, focusing on resources and actions needed for making technology available rather than on methods and interventions for its implementation. The results evidence a gap in formal guidelines to guide the implementation process in Brazil, representing an opportunity for the development of models aligned with the reality of the SUS.
O objetivo foi identificar o arcabouço regulatório e as orientações federais que sustentam o processo de implementação de tecnologias em saúde no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), por meio da análise de documentos e legislações relacionados à Política Nacional de Gestão de Tecnologias de Saúde, publicados entre 2009 e 2021. Foi realizada busca e seleção dos documentos e posterior extração de dados, agrupados por três categorias: normativas estruturantes, recomendações na avaliação de tecnologias e recomendações nas diretrizes clínicas. Em 38,8% das normativas, foram identificadas citações à implementação relacionadas principalmente às diretrizes clínicas do SUS, mas nenhum documento dedicado a orientar as ações de implementação. As recomendações relacionadas às implementações foram identificadas em 27,1% dos relatórios e em 66,1% das diretrizes, mas sem padronização e, de modo geral, pouco detalhadas, com foco em recursos e ações necessárias para a disponibilização da tecnologia, ao invés de métodos e intervenções para implementação. Os resultados confirmam a existência de uma lacuna de diretrizes formais para guiar o processo de implementação no Brasil, o que se constitui em oportunidade para o desenvolvimento de modelos alinhados à realidade do SUS.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Social participation in the health technology incorporation process into Unified Health System.Rev Saude Publica. 2019 Dec 20;53:109. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053001420. eCollection 2019. Rev Saude Publica. 2019. PMID: 31859904 Free PMC article.
-
Government Cloud Computing Policies: Potential Opportunities for Advancing Military Biomedical Research.Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e438-e447. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx114. Mil Med. 2018. PMID: 29425378
-
Strategies for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in public health: an overview of systematic reviews.Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jan 24;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00815-4. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022. PMID: 35073897 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Legislation on primary care in Brazilian Unified National Health System: document analysis].Cad Saude Publica. 2016 Mar;32(3):e00181314. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00181314. Epub 2016 Mar 22. Cad Saude Publica. 2016. PMID: 27027459 Review. Portuguese.
Cited by
-
Promoting safe and appropriate use of miltefosine to treat tegumentary leishmaniasis in Brazil: a best practice implementation project.JBI Evid Implement. 2025 Jan 1;23(1):14-23. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000416. JBI Evid Implement. 2025. PMID: 38557826 Free PMC article.
-
Miltefosine implementation for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: access indicators in the state of Minas Gerais, 2021-2024.Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025 Jun 20;34:e20240690. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240690.en. eCollection 2025. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025. PMID: 40561298 Free PMC article.
-
Recalculation of the budgetary impact of risperidone use for Autism Spectrum Disorder: a case study using measured demand data, Brazil, 2017-2019.Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025 Aug 8;34:e20240732. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240732.en. eCollection 2025. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025. PMID: 40802386 Free PMC article.
-
GerenciaVida: Validity Evidence of a Mobile Application for Suicide Behavior Management.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jul 15;22(7):1115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071115. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40724181 Free PMC article.
-
Digital Health - A Tool of Empowerment and Gender Equality?Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Jan 13;121(12):e20240739. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240739. eCollection 2025. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 39813462 Free PMC article. English, Portuguese. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous