Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jan 10;19(1):e0295645.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295645. eCollection 2024.

Effects of two gait retraining programs on pain, function, and lower limb kinematics in runners with patellofemoral pain: A randomized controlled trial

José Roberto de Souza Júnior  1 , Pedro Henrique Reis Rabelo  2 , Thiago Vilela Lemos  2   3 , Jean-Francois Esculier  4   5 , Glauber Marques Paraizo Barbosa  6 , João Paulo Chieregato Matheus  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of two gait retraining programs on pain, function, and lower limb kinematics in runners with patellofemoral pain: A randomized controlled trial

José Roberto de Souza Júnior et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Patellofemoral Pain (PFP) is one of the main injuries in runners. Consistent evidence support strengthening programs to modulate symptoms, however, few studies investigated the effects of gait retraining programs.

Objective: To investigate the effects of two different two-week partially supervised gait retraining programs on pain, function, and lower limb kinematics of runners with PFP.

Methods: Randomized controlled trial. Thirty runners were allocated to gait retraining groups focusing on impact (n = 10) or cadence (n = 10), or to a control group (n = 10). Impact group received guidance to reduce tibial acceleration by 50%, while cadence group was asked to increase cadence by 7.5-10%. The control group did not receive any intervention. Usual and running pain, knee function, and lower limb kinematics (contralateral pelvic drop, hip adduction, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, tibia inclination, and foot inclination) were evaluated before (T0), immediately after the intervention (T2), and six months after the protocol (T24).

Results: A significant group x time interaction was found for running pain (p = 0.010) and knee function (p = 0.019). Both programs had greater improvements in running pain compared to no intervention at T24 (Impact x Control-mean difference (MD) -3.2, 95% CI -5.1 to -1.3, p = 0.001; Cadence x Control-MD -2.9, 95% CI -4.8 to -1.0, p = 0.002). Participants of the impact group had greater improvements in knee function compared to no intervention at T2 (Impact x Control-MD 10.8, 95% CI 1.0 to 20.6, p = 0.027). No between-group differences in usual pain and lower limb kinematics were found (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Compared to no intervention, both programs were more effective in improving running pain six months after the protocol. The program focused on impact was more effective in improving knee function immediately after the intervention. Clinical trial registry number: RBR-8yb47v.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram of the study.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Visual feedback provided to impact group participants.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Experimental setup and an example of the two-dimensional measurements.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

    1. Crossley KM, Stefanik JJ, Selfe J, Collins NJ, Davis IS, Powers CM, et al.. 2016 Patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Manchester. Part 1: Terminology, definitions, clinical examination, natural history, patellofemoral osteoarthritis, and patient reported outcome measures. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(14):839–843. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096384 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith BE, Selfe J, Thacker D, Hendrick P, Bateman M, Moffatt F, et al..Incidence and prevalence of patellofemoral pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190892. 10.1371/journal.pone.0190892 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lopes AD, Hespanhol LC, Yeung SS, Costa LOP. What are the Main Running-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries? Sports Med. 2012;42(10):891–905. 10.1007/bf03262301 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins NJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Crossley KM, van Linschoten RL, Vicenzino B, van Middelkoop M. Prognostic factors for patellofemoral pain: a multicentre observational analysis. Br. J. Sports. Med. 2012;47(4):227–233. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091696 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lankhorst NE, van Middelkoop M, Crossley KM, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Oei EHG, Vicenzino B, et al..Factors that predict a poor outcome 5–8 years after the diagnosis of patellofemoral pain: a multicentre observational analysis. Br. J. Sports. Med. 2015;50(14):881–886. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094664 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types