Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar:138:107436.
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107436. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

Addressing adverse social determinants of health in pediatric primary care: Study protocol for a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial in two national pediatric practice-based research networks

Affiliations

Addressing adverse social determinants of health in pediatric primary care: Study protocol for a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial in two national pediatric practice-based research networks

Annelise Brochier et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Growing evidence linking social determinants of health (SDOH) to child health outcomes has prompted widespread recommendations for pediatricians to screen and refer for adverse SDOH at primary care visits. Yet there is little evidence to date demonstrating the effectiveness of practice-based SDOH screening and referral interventions on increasing family engagement with resources. This hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial aims to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a low-touch implementation strategy in order to facilitate dissemination of an existing SDOH screening and referral system (WE CARE) and demonstrate its effectiveness and sustainability in various pediatric practices.

Methods: We recruited eighteen pediatric practices in fourteen US states through two pediatric practice-based research networks. For this stepped wedge cluster RCT, practices serve as their own controls during the Usual Care phase and implement WE CARE during the intervention phase via one of two randomized implementation strategies: self-directed, pre-recorded webinar vs. study team-facilitated, live webinar. We collect data at practice, clinician/staff, and parent levels to assess outcomes grounded in the Proctor Conceptual Model of Implementation Research. We use generalized mixed effects models and differences in proportions to compare rates of resource referrals by implementation strategy, and intention-to-treat analysis to compare odds of engagement with new resources among families enrolled in the Usual Care vs. WE CARE phases.

Discussion: Findings from this trial may inform decisions about broader dissemination of SDOH screening systems into a diverse spectrum of pediatric practices across the US and potentially minimize the impact of adverse SDOH on children and families.

Keywords: Pediatrics; Social determinants of health; Social needs; Social risks; Social screening tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proctor Conceptual Model of Implementation Research, applied to WE CARE Study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Map of WE CARE study sites, coded by urbanicity, practice-based research network, and randomized implementation strategy assignment.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design with multiple data collection points for the WE CARE study. Please note that this figure is not to scale. The dotted line signifies when the COVID-19 pandemic began (March 2020) during the study period. Study Phases and Activities:
  1. 1st phase is Usual Care

  2. 2nd phase is Core Training (X= Live Webinar, O=Pre-recorded Webinar)

  3. 3rd phase is Pilot

  4. 4th is WE CARE

  5. Δ signifies Chart Review Period

Relationship to Study Aims:
  1. Non-inferiority Evaluation: Comparison of X vs. O

  2. Implementation Evaluation: Proportion of visits with completed screener from Chart Review

  3. Effectiveness Evaluation: Comparison of parent surveys in Usual Care phase vs. WE CARE phase

Similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organization. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health: debates, policy & practice, case studies; 2010. Accessed July 30, 2020. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44489/1/9789241500852_eng.pdf
    1. Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA, eds. From Neurons to Neighborhoods. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. - PubMed
    1. Evans GW, Brooks-Gunn J, Klebanov PK. Stressing out the poor: chronic physiological stress and the income-achievement gap. Community Investments. 2011;23:22–27. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02008.x - DOI
    1. Halfon N, Hochstein M. Life course health development: an integrated framework for developing health, policy, and research. Milbank Quarterly. 2002;80(3):433–479, iii. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ben-Shlomo Y, Kuh D. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2002;31(2):285–293 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources